FoR-Net: Learning to Focus on Hard Regions for Efficient Semantic Segmentation

We present FoR-Net, a lightweight architecture for semantic segmentation that focuses on identifying and enhancing hard regions. Instead of relying on heavy global modeling, FoR-Net adopts an efficient strategy that selectively emphasizes informative regions through a learned importance map and a Top-K activation mechanism. Specifically, a selector module predicts region-wise importance, enabling the model to focus on challenging areas such as thin structures and object boundaries. Multi-scale reasoning is achieved using convolutional branches with different receptive fields, allowing diverse spatial context aggregation. We evaluate FoR-Net on the Cityscapes benchmark under limited computational resources. Despite its lightweight design and standard training configuration, FoR-Net achieves competitive performance and demonstrates improved consistency in challenging regions. These results suggest that region-focused reasoning provides a simple yet effective inductive bias for efficient semantic segmentation.

The Surprising Effectiveness of Canonical Knowledge Distillation for Semantic Segmentation

Recent knowledge distillation (KD) methods for semantic segmentation introduce increasingly complex hand-crafted objectives, yet are typically evaluated under fixed iteration schedules. These objectives substantially increase per-iteration cost, meaning equal iteration counts do not correspond to equal training budgets. It is therefore unclear whether reported gains reflect stronger distillation signals or simply greater compute. We show that iteration-based comparisons are misleading: when wall-clock compute is matched, \textit{canonical} logit- and feature-based KD outperform recent segmentation-specific methods. Under extended training, feature-based distillation achieves state-of-the-art ResNet-18 performance on Cityscapes and ADE20K. A PSPNet ResNet-18 student closely approaches its ResNet-101 teacher despite using only one quarter of the parameters, reaching 99\% of the teacher's mIoU on Cityscapes (79.0 vs.\ 79.8) and 92\% on ADE20K. Our results challenge the prevailing assumption that KD for segmentation requires task-specific mechanisms and suggest that scaling, rather than complex hand-crafted objectives, should guide future method design.