Thinking in Boxes: 3D Editing in Real Images Made Easy

Text and 2D-conditioning interfaces provide weak, ambiguous control over spatial transformations in image editing -- particularly under large object motions and camera changes. Prior work has used 3D primitives such as boxes, but only as loose conditioning signals indicating approximate object location rather than specifying the transformation. We instead use 3D boxes as structured specifications: the user provides the input and output boxes of the edit, casting editing as a well-posed geometry problem. This ``thinking in boxes'' interface, where each box face is color-coded to convey 3D orientation, gives precise control over translation, rotation, scaling, and viewpoint changes in real images while preserving scene and object identity, and recovering previously unseen object regions. To ground transformations in scene appearance, we introduce a depth-aligned planar floor as a global reference frame, shaded with depth-aware cues. Conditioned on this structure, an image generator produces consistent results under large transformations. Trained in two stages -- on synthetic multi-object scenes and a small set of real-world videos from Objectron -- the system generalizes to complex, in-the-wild real images. Our method operates directly on real photographs and substantially outperforms recent state-of-the-art methods on large 3D edits.

Efficient Geometry-Controlled High-Resolution Satellite Image Synthesis

High-resolution satellite images are often scarce and costly, especially for remote areas or infrequent events. This shortage hampers the development and testing of machine learning models for land-cover classification, change detection, and disaster monitoring. In this paper, we tackle the problem of geometry-controlled high-resolution satellite image synthesis by adding control over existing pre-trained diffusion models. We propose a simple yet efficient method for controlling the synthesis process by leveraging only skip connection features using windowed cross-attention modules. Several previously established control techniques are compared, indicating that our method achieves comparable performance while leading to a better alignment with the geometry control map. We also discuss the limitations in current evaluation approaches, amplifying the necessity of a consistent alignment assessment.