Annalisa Gallina, Marco Fiorucci, Marco Brigo +2cs.CV
The rapid advancement of generative models has significantly worsened the problem of manipulated image detection, as these methods are capable of producing highly realistic forgeries, reinforcing the importance of multimedia forensics. Conventional approaches typically frame image manipulation detection as a binary classification task (real vs. generated), which limits the capability to distinguish and localize different forms of manipulation. To address these constraints, this work extends an existing detector by introducing a unified multiclass framework (real vs. fully generated vs. tampered). In addition to classifying image authenticity, the framework incorporates a segmentation branch to enable pixel-level localization of tampered regions. The proposed approach outperforms selected recent benchmarks, offering an efficient solution with improved classification accuracy and higher IoU scores for the localization task. Find the code at https://github.com/anngal01/From-Detection-to-Localization-A-Unified-Forensics-Framework-for-Fully-Synthetic-and-Tampered-Images.
Background manipulation is a practical but under-specified image-forensics setting: the manipulated evidence can sit outside the salient foreground object, while many evaluations emphasize object-centric copy-move, splicing, or generic synthetic edits. We introduce BG-REAL, a public real-data anchored benchmark package for background manipulation detection and localization. The current release is built from Open Images V7 instance-segmentation sources and contains 7,000 processed samples over 1,200 source groups, including 6,000 public-data anchored samples and 1,000 synthetic control samples. BG-REAL covers six edit families, matched authentic controls, source-group splits, mask and leakage QA, 599 human-assisted quality-control rows, three completed external baselines (TruFor, MVSS-Net, and HiFi-Net), and five-seed model evaluation. Beyond aggregate accuracy, we use matched-authentic-control diagnostics to measure how often baselines misclassify re-encoded authentic images as manipulated at a threshold fixed on held-out validation data; false-positive rates range from 0.57 (TruFor, the lowest) to 1.00 (several weak or mask-informed baselines), indicating that re-encoding artifacts are a shared shortcut risk across baselines rather than a problem specific to any one model. The release provides the construction pipeline, evaluation protocol, paper-ready figures, and reproduction documentation. We frame BG-REAL as a background-manipulation-focused complement to general image-manipulation-localization benchmarks, not as a fully real-only or general-purpose benchmark.