In-Loop Model Adaptation with Coupled Latent-Noise Guidance for High-Fidelity Subject-Driven Text-to-Image Generation

Text-to-image diffusion models have achieved remarkable success in generating high-quality images from a given text prompt. Subject-driven generation aims to synthesize customized images to mimic the appearance of subjects in given reference images within different visual contexts specified by the text prompts. The central challenge here is that, when the reference image changes, the diffusion model cannot efficiently adapt to different visual contexts while consistently maintaining the subject identity. Existing methods either train the model with a large domain-specific dataset or fine-tune the model using the reference image for hundreds of iterations before actual image generation. In this work, we explore a new approach, called \textit{In-Loop Model Adaptation} (IMA), which adapts the core diffusion model at each generation step during the actual process of image generation, without being trained on the reference image before the generation process. To this end, we establish a DDIM inversion chain that maps the reference image to a sequence of latent, as well as a text-to-image generation chain which generates the image from the text prompt only. We then introduce a masked latent consistency loss and a noise regularization loss to characterize the latent-noise difference between the diffusion model and these two chains at each generation step. This coupled latent-noise loss is used to guide the in-loop model adaptation to preserve the subject identity specified by the reference image while maintaining accurate alignment with the text prompt, resulting in high-fidelity text-to-image generation. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed IMA method significantly improves the performance of subject-driven text-to-image generation.

DriftScope: Measuring The Hidden Effects of Diffusion Model Adaptation

Adapting pre-trained text-to-image diffusion models, whether to learn new visual concepts or erase unwanted ones, is routinely evaluated on its intended effects alone. We argue this framing is incomplete. Through sparse autoencoder analysis and zero-shot classification, we demonstrate that adaptation systematically damages semantically unrelated concepts in ways that aggregate metrics structurally cannot surface: when damage is severe enough for FID and KID to respond, the model is already nearly unusable; when the model remains functional, FID and KID stay flat while specific classes silently suffer worst-case zero-shot accuracy drops of up to 18.9 points and concept-level distributions shift dramatically. This pattern appears at both ends of the adaptation spectrum (concept customization and concept unlearning), suggesting it is a systematic consequence of weight-level modification rather than an artifact of any particular method. To surface this hidden drift before deployment, we introduce DriftScope, a prompt-level diagnostic tool that takes any two model checkpoints and returns a ranked list of tokens whose visual concepts have shifted most between them. DriftScope optimizes a soft prompt to attribute drift at the token level without requiring access to real data or model internals. The result is an interpretable, concept-level audit that aggregate evaluation cannot provide.