Few-shot segmentation (FSS) commonly assumes clean pixel-level support masks, yet practical support supervision often uses boxes, scribbles, coarse masks, or pseudo-masks. These weak annotations may include texture-similar distractors and background context alongside the target, contaminating class prototypes or visual prompts before query prediction. We introduce SADe, a predictor-agnostic support decontamination layer that estimates the reliability of selected support patches without query information. Central to SADe is sparse autoencoder (SAE) atom evidence: dense similarity may respond to both target and texture-similar context, whereas contrasting atom activations inside and outside the weak-support region provides factor-level reliability cues. A lightweight router combines atom evidence with dense similarity and episode statistics to predict patch reliability and generate a cleaned support mask. Trained once on synthetic weak-support episodes from FSS-1000, the router is frozen for all target evaluations. The resulting mask supports standalone prediction or can be supplied to heterogeneous FSS models through native support interfaces without altering query-side inference. Under a matched weak-support protocol, SADe achieves the highest query mIoU in six of nine standalone prompt-shot combinations. With the same ProMi query head, it is within 0.03 mIoU of SAM3-derived masks under tight boxes and surpasses them by 11.17 and 19.49 points under box-r2 and box-r4, respectively. As a plug-in, SADe improves over raw support in 70 of 72 matched box-family comparisons across four frozen downstream models and two datasets. On point and scribble prompts, its average performance remains close to the corresponding raw-support baseline. Ablations and atom-removal controls show that atom evidence contributes reliability information beyond dense similarity.
Héctor Laria, Yiping Han, Julian D. Santamaria +4cs.CV
Adapting pre-trained text-to-image diffusion models, whether to learn new visual concepts or erase unwanted ones, is routinely evaluated on its intended effects alone. We argue this framing is incomplete. Through sparse autoencoder analysis and zero-shot classification, we demonstrate that adaptation systematically damages semantically unrelated concepts in ways that aggregate metrics structurally cannot surface: when damage is severe enough for FID and KID to respond, the model is already nearly unusable; when the model remains functional, FID and KID stay flat while specific classes silently suffer worst-case zero-shot accuracy drops of up to 18.9 points and concept-level distributions shift dramatically. This pattern appears at both ends of the adaptation spectrum (concept customization and concept unlearning), suggesting it is a systematic consequence of weight-level modification rather than an artifact of any particular method. To surface this hidden drift before deployment, we introduce DriftScope, a prompt-level diagnostic tool that takes any two model checkpoints and returns a ranked list of tokens whose visual concepts have shifted most between them. DriftScope optimizes a soft prompt to attribute drift at the token level without requiring access to real data or model internals. The result is an interpretable, concept-level audit that aggregate evaluation cannot provide.