Calibrated Closed-Form Uncertainty for Radiative Gaussian Splatting in Sparse-View CT

Radiative Gaussian splatting has made sparse-view CT reconstruction fast, but existing methods output point estimates with no notion of where the reconstruction can be trusted. We exploit a property of transmissive X-ray imaging that RGB splatting cannot claim -- projection and voxelization are strictly linear in the per-Gaussian densities -- to equip radiative Gaussians with a variational density posterior whose predictive variance propagates in closed form, exactly, in a single forward pass, in both volume space ($σ^2(x)=\sum_i g_i(x)^2 s_i^2$) and projection space ($\mathrm{Var}[I_p]=\sum_i w_{i,p}^2 s_i^2$). We present the first systematic calibration study for Gaussian-splatting CT (Spearman / AUSE / ECE with temperature scaling), showing that the resulting per-voxel uncertainty ranks true reconstruction error on 14 of 15 scenes of the official benchmark across three view budgets -- 9 of 15 additionally meeting our magnitude-calibration target after a single temperature -- while the perturbation-ensemble heuristic of concurrent work, transplanted to voxel space under the same protocol on our development scenes, does not (rank correlation as low as $-0.08$). We then dissect why uncalibrated acquisition scores can nevertheless select acceptable views, identifying three regimes -- flat (isotropic, balanced), pathological (degenerate coverage), and anisotropic -- and showing, in controlled single-scene testbeds, that principled uncertainty earns a measurable premium only in the last, motivating a coverage-gated, maturity-scheduled acquisition policy; the same calibrated posterior further points toward a dose-adaptive stopping rule, whose experimental validation we leave to future work.

Design Choices in Splitting-Based Self-Supervised Sparse-View CT Reconstruction

Self-supervised data splitting has emerged as a promising paradigm for sparse-view CT reconstruction, enabling training from incomplete measurements without fully sampled ground truth. However, the influence of key design choices, including partitioning strategy, preprocessing, and inference, remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we introduce a unified framework that decomposes splitting-based reconstruction into these three components, enabling controlled comparison of existing methods and two incremental extensions: multi-partition splitting and an alternative inference strategy. Experiments on simulated LoDoPaB-CT data under independent and correlated noise, together with validation on the real-world 2DeteCT dataset, show that the optimal partitioning strategy strongly depends on the measurement noise structure. Lattice-based splitting performs favorably under independent noise, whereas angular masking is more robust under correlated noise and real measured data. Multi-partition splitting consistently improves over pure projection-wise splitting in several settings. Complementary perceptual and structural metrics, including LPIPS and HaarPSI, reveal differences between masking strategies that are less apparent from PSNR and SSIM alone. These results provide practical guidelines for designing self-supervised sparse-view CT reconstruction methods and highlight the limitations of common independence assumptions in realistic imaging environments.