Networks provide a fundamental representation of relationships among entities. However, real-world networks are often corrupted by noise caused by measurement errors and inherent stochasticity, hindering the discovery of meaningful structure. Most denoising methods rely on similarity-driven diffusion and ignore the non-Euclidean geometry of graphs, where local variations induce heterogeneous information transport. This motivates a geometric revisit of network denoising. In this work, we propose Ricci-Diffusion, a curvature-guided graph diffusion method inspired by Ricci flow. Specifically, Ricci-Diffusion exhibits a Ricci-flow-like evolution, in which relative edge-level curvature modulates local transport in the diffusion kernel and guides edge-weight updates toward a more regular graph geometry. We further provide a theoretical analysis showing that curvature can distinguish graph structures that common similarity-driven diffusion kernels fail to separate, and that curvature induces first-order corrections in one-step diffusion updates. The resulting diffusion process explicitly characterizes transport heterogeneity across local geometries and admits theoretical convergence to a stable denoised network. Results on real-world and synthetic graphs show that curvature-guided updates and curvature homogenization improve structure recovery and downstream performance.
Curvature notions on graphs, particularly Ollivier-Ricci and Forman, have emerged as powerful tools for addressing fundamental issues in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) such as oversmoothing and oversquashing, but rely almost exclusively on local edge-level comparisons and therefore fail to certify how information actually propagates over long distances. We introduce Entropic Curvature, a global, transport-based curvature obtained by extending the Lott-Sturm-Villani framework to graphs through the displacement convexity of entropy along Wasserstein geodesics. We define a tractable Weak Entropic Curvature proxy that lower-bounds the global entropic curvature, and from it derive (i) a Poincare-type inequality controlling oversmoothing, (ii) a transport-entropy generalization bound, and (iii) an expansion paradox proving that sparsity, strong spectral expansion, and positive entropic curvature cannot coexist in large graphs, unifying oversmoothing and oversquashing as opposite ends of a single curvature spectrum. We translate the theory into three practical mechanisms, the E-Gate aggregator, the ENT structural encoding, and Midpoint-Completion Rewiring (MCR), and benchmark them against SDRF, FoSR, BORF, LCP, and Graph Ricci Flow on six node-classification benchmarks, and graph-classification.
Detecting communities in heterophilic graphs -- where connected nodes often belong to different classes -- is hard for unsupervised methods: classical modularity and spectral methods are feature agnostic, while deep graph-clustering methods rely on contrastive or generative machinery that is opaque. We propose Curvature-Guided Sheaf Diffusion (CGSD), a fully unsupervised community-detection algorithm that uses the discrete Forman--Ricci curvature of each edge as its single topological signal, propagated through every stage of an end-to-end pipeline. CGSD makes three concrete contributions: (i)~a curvature-gated sheaf-diffusion encoder that gates edge messages by $σ(κ_e)$ and is trained from three label-free structural losses (modularity, anti-collapse, curvature-weighted reconstruction); (ii)~a curvature-aware spectral clusterer (CSpec) that re-weights the $k$-NN affinity of the embedding by $σ(ακ_{e^*})$ before Ng--Jordan--Weiss; and (iii)~a unified label-free evaluation against nine truly-unsupervised baselines. On five heterophilic benchmarks (Cora, Cornell, Texas, Wisconsin, Chameleon), CGSD wins outright on Wisconsin and Chameleon and is competitive on the remaining three against nine unsupervised baselines. The gain over the strongest baseline is driven by the clusterer, not the encoder: on the same embedding, CSpec improves mean NMI from $0.091$ with $K$-Means to $0.107$ ($+15\%$, paired $t$-test $p=0.008$). The mechanism is interpretable: intra-community and inter-community curvature distributions are visibly separated. Code is open-sourced at https://github.com/woodywff/cgsd.
Current evaluation practices in relational learning rely heavily on flat leaderboards that average performance across heterogeneous datasets, implicitly assuming a uniform underlying structure. We show that this assumption introduces systematic bias: it obscures geometry-dependent performance variations and can lead to misleading conclusions about model generalization. In this work, we identify intrinsic geometry as a key latent factor governing model effectiveness. We demonstrate that conventional aggregated metrics mask critical performance trade-offs that only become visible when datasets are stratified by their geometric properties. To address this issue, we introduce a curvature-stratified evaluation framework that partitions datasets into positive, negative, and near-zero curvature regimes. Our benchmark evaluates 18 representative models including Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs), Graph Foundation Models (GFMs), and tabular learning methods across 14 datasets. We find that model rankings are highly stable within each curvature regime but shift significantly across regimes, indicating that performance is fundamentally geometry-dependent rather than universally transferable. Notably, we identify regimes where GFMs offer diminishing returns compared to geometry-aligned GNNs. Based on these findings, we propose a geometry-aware evaluation protocol that yields more reliable and interpretable comparisons than standard aggregated benchmarks. We release all code, curvature-stratified dataset splits, and evaluation tools to support reproducible and rigorous assessment of future relational learning methods. Code and datasets are provided in our project homepage: https://sirbabbage.github.io/CurvBench_HOME/.