Foundation Agents Meet Agentic Deep Research: Evidence-Grounded Clinical Code Forecasting

Next-encounter ICD forecasting predicts which standardized diagnosis codes will be documented at a future visit from the longitudinal record available beforehand. The task is prospective and multi-label: the target note does not yet exist, and several codes may be correct. Structured EHR foundation models capture recurrence and temporal progression, whereas language foundation models generate flexible diagnostic hypotheses. We introduce ICD-Deepresearch, a DeepResearch workflow that composes these predictive foundation models with medical search and ICD dictionaries. Because no source reveals the future code set, research evaluates candidate transitions by linking patient evidence, external clinical relations, and exact code semantics under a fixed top-K budget. Candidate Generation uses SparseEHR to produce an EHR Prior that initializes two bounded Research Expansion rounds; an independent GPT-5 Direct Forecast supplies complementary candidates. Final Selection validates, deduplicates, and jointly ranks both paths, after which a separate module writes rationales without changing predictions. Finally ICD-Deepresearch achieves patient-averaged precision/recall of 24.60/35.09% on MIMIC-III and 25.14/48.32% on MIMIC-IV. Physicians rate 51% and 68% of its retrieved documents useful, compared with 22% and 39% for standalone GPT-5 web search and 32% and 41% for Medical Deep Research. ICD-Deepresearch therefore improves over the registered local comparators while retrieving evidence with higher physician-rated usefulness than the standalone research systems

Primary ICD Category Prediction using LLM-based Probing

Objective: ICD codes are central to reimbursement, research, and population health surveillance, yet automated coding systems often struggle to integrate diagnostic signals from both clinical narratives and structured electronic health record (EHR) variables. We evaluated whether frozen medical large language model (LLM) representations can serve as a shared embedding space for multimodal primary diagnosis category prediction. Materials and Methods: We constructed a MIMIC-IV cohort of 13,645 admissions from the 10 most frequent primary ICD-10 codes, consolidated into seven categories. Structured variables were serialized into clinical narratives and combined with leakage-pruned discharge notes. Using a frozen MedFound-Llama3-8B-finetuned backbone, we extracted hidden states from five transformer layers and trained linear probes for structured-only, unstructured-only, and combined inputs, comparing against XGBoost and information-matched PLM-ICD baselines and evaluating MIMIC-III adaptation with a compact bottleneck adapter. Results: The combined probe performed best on MIMIC-IV (87.69% strict; 91.45% medical accuracy), exceeding both single-modality probes and baselines. The structured-only probe outperformed its standard baseline by 6.19 points in medical accuracy. Diagnostic information became increasingly linearly separable in deeper layers, and a 2M-parameter adapter restored cross-dataset transfer to MIMIC-III using only 5% of target labels. Discussion: LLM embeddings can unify structured and narrative EHR information for multimodal diagnosis prediction, supporting efficient reuse of clinical representations across modalities and datasets through a small representation-level module. Conclusion: Multimodal probing of frozen medical LLM representations provides a practical approach for studying EHR modalities and adapting clinical representations across datasets.

Can Post-Training Turn LLMs into Good Medical Coders? An Empirical Study of Generative ICD Coding

Automated International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding is a core medical-coding task for billing, epidemiology, and clinical decision support. Generative large language models (LLMs) are often reported as weak medical coders, but this finding mainly comes from inference-time settings such as prompting, retrieval, reranking, or tool use, leaving the role of task-specific post-training underexplored. We present a controlled empirical study of post-training for generative ICD coding, comparing discriminative baselines with LLM coders across prompting, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning under a common protocol and metric set. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate RL-based post-training for generative LLM coders in ICD coding. We further introduce PHI, a diagnostic curriculum that extends GRPO to refine missed-code cases. Our results show that prompting-only evaluation substantially underestimates the potential of LLMs for ICD coding. SFT provides the main capability jump, GRPO further improves code-set prediction beyond SFT, and PHI provides targeted gains on macro-level performance. These findings suggest that the main bottleneck is not the generative formulation alone, but how the model is adapted and optimized for full-taxonomy recall. We release our code, data splits, and checkpoints at https://github.com/AlexandreWANG915/LLM4ICD.

Automated ICD Classification of Psychiatric Diagnoses: From Classical NLP to Large Language Models

Mental health has become a global priority, leading to a massive administrative burden in the coding of clinical diagnoses. This study proposes the automation of psychiatric diagnostic analysis by mapping free-text descriptions to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) using Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques. Utilizing a specialized dataset of 145,513 Spanish psychiatric descriptions, various text representation paradigms were evaluated, ranging from classical frequency-based models (BoW, TF-IDF) to state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) such as e5\_large, BioLORD, and Llama-3-8B. Results indicate that transformer-based embeddings consistently outperform traditional methods by capturing implicit semantic cues and nuanced medical terminology. The e5\_large model, through end-to-end fine-tuning, achieved the highest performance with a $F1_{micro}$ score of 0.866. This research demonstrates that adapting LLMs to specific clinical nomenclature is essential for overcoming the challenges of ``long-tail'' label distributions and the inherent ambiguity of psychiatric discourse.