Francesco Mantegna, Gereon Elvers, Dulhan Jayalath +18cs.LG
The ambition of the 2025 PNPL competition (Landau et al., 2025) was to launch a multi-year curriculum for non-invasive speech decoding. Designed to progress from foundational tasks toward the linguistic complexity required for a practical brain-computer interface (BCI), it set the stage with speech detection and phoneme classification tasks. Winning submissions reached F1-macro scores of 95.6% and 73.6% on the respective tasks (Elvers et al., 2026), highly significant advances. This success was built on the LibriBrain dataset (Özdogan et al., 2025), the largest within-subject MEG dataset recorded at the time with ${\sim}50$ hours of data for one subject. However, while within-subject scale drives strong decoding performance, a practical BCI must generalise to new users from minutes of data, not hours. The 2026 PNPL competition responds to this challenge with LibriBrain100 (Mantegna et al., 2026), an extended LibriBrain dataset with 32 additional subjects (${\sim}40$ minutes each) plus even more within-subject data (${\sim}80$ hours). Advancing the curriculum of tasks to focus on word classification, two complementary tracks are presented in this competition: the Deep track targets within-subject word classification at scale, aiming at the best possible performance; the Broad track targets cross-subject generalisation, progressively reducing the amount of subject-specific fine-tuning data from ${\sim}40$ to ${\sim}20$ to ${\sim}10$ minutes, a duration that falls within a clinically feasible range and brings us a step closer to a non-invasive BCI capable of restoring communication to people living with profound paralysis.
Reported accuracy in electroencephalography (EEG) emotion recognition depends on the complete evaluation procedure, not only the classifier. We separate the target quantity, development procedure, and reporting rule, then use one archived dynamical graph convolutional neural network (DGCNN) pathway on SEED and SEED-IV as an illustrative case. In a protocol-matched subject-dependent check, the SEED result was within 1.47 percentage points of the public reference value; the 3.40-point SEED-IV difference remained unresolved. Across 30 matched SEED subject-session trajectories, checkpoint selection based on repeated test-set evaluation increased mean window accuracy from 0.7855 at epoch 80 to 0.8892. Under five-fold subject-disjoint evaluation, validation-selected checkpoints achieved training-participant trial accuracies of 0.9990 on SEED and 0.9920 on SEED-IV. Accuracy for entirely held-out participants was 0.5348 (95% conditional subject-level bias-corrected and accelerated [BCa] interval [0.4667, 0.5985]) on SEED. The SEED-IV estimate was 0.3954 ([0.3343, 0.4648]) and is reported only as secondary sensitivity evidence because its protocol-matched compatibility check remained unresolved. The observed train-to-held-out-subject gaps are inconsistent with simple optimization underfitting, but they do not isolate subject identity from implementation, preprocessing, representation, or distributional factors. Supporting analyses further showed that participant rankings depended on representation and time scale, while a development-selected tail-risk ensemble did not establish a positive gain in a separate final evaluation. Subject-dependent, subject-disjoint, and cross-session results should therefore be reported as answers to different questions.
Ji-Hoon Heo, Aleksandra Joanna Wisniewska, Seo-Hyun Lee +1cs.LG cs.AI
Generalizing across subjects remains challenging in invasive neural recordings because electrode configurations, anatomical structures, and neural signal patterns vary substantially across individuals. To investigate such inter-subject variability, we propose a cross-subject semantic decoding framework that aligns neural responses to speech perception from multiple subjects into a shared latent space and learns a mapping from the aligned neural representations to contextual embeddings. More specifically, using electrocorticography data collected during natural language comprehension, we estimate the shared space using the shared response model and train a decoder to predict contextual semantic embeddings from projected neural responses. For a held-out subject, we estimate a subject-specific projection into the predefined shared space, and directly apply the pretrained decoder without any retraining. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework consistently outperforms baseline methods across evaluation settings and exhibits a reduced performance drop from source subject to held-out subject testing, indicating improved cross-subject generalization. These results suggest that aligning neural activity into a shared latent space, while decoding in a semantic embedding space, provides an effective strategy for improving cross-subject generalization by reducing subject-specific differences in neural responses while effectively capturing shared stimulus-related representations.
The development of generalizable electroencephalography (EEG) decoding models is essential for robust brain-computer interfaces (BCI) and objective neural biomarkers in mental health. Conventional approaches have been hindered by poor cross-subject and cross-task generalization, owing to high inter-subject variability and non-stationary neural signals. We address this challenge with a zero-shot cross-subject decoding framework on the large-scale Healthy Brain Network dataset, benchmarking a convolutional neural network baseline, a hybrid LSTM, and a Transformer-based foundation model. To adapt the Transformer for regression while averting catastrophic forgetting, we propose a novel progressive unfreezing strategy. The baseline yielded an nRMSE of 0.9991, whereas our fine-tuned Transformer achieved 0.9799 on unseen subjects. This work advances scalable, calibration-free EEG decoding for computational psychiatry and behavioral prediction.
Charlotte Genevier Wyman, Leanne Hirshfieldcs.LG eess.SP
Interpretable brain-computer interface classifiers that generalize across subjects without calibration remain an open challenge. We evaluated whether prototype-based cross-attention can provide competitive, inherently interpretable ERP classification across paradigms under deployment-compatible conditions. We propose ERP-XTTN (ERP Cross-Attention), a cross-attention architecture that routes input EEG peaks to fixed difference-wave prototypes via query-key-only cross-attention with no value projection. Classification is based directly on prototype similarity and a separate measure of component amplitude, so that prototype content contributes to every decision by construction. Prototypes are derived automatically from prominent extrema in the training-fold grand-average difference wave. We evaluated across three public sources (BNCI Horizon 2020, HRI Cursor, and ERP CORE) encompassing eight ERP components (ERN, LRP, ErrP, N170, P300, N2pc, MMN, N400). Evaluations used LOSO cross-validation with causal filtering at a three-channel montage, compared against EEGNet, EEG-Deformer, EPMN, and xDAWN with Riemannian geometry. The mean performance gap between the best baseline and ERP-XTTN was 0.025 AUROC. Prototype interventions confirmed that decisions depend on prototype content rather than on the routing attention pattern alone. False positives morphologically resembled true positives more than true negatives did, so classification errors are neurophysiologically explicable. ERP-XTTN generalizes across diverse ERP morphologies under causal, calibration-free conditions, while retaining competitive performance and decisions that depend directly on physiological prototype content. Unlike post-hoc explanation methods for black-box models, the basis of each decision is directly observable in the trained model. To our knowledge, this is the first epoch-level LOSO benchmark on ERP CORE.
Cross-subject generalization in biomedical time-series refers to training on data from some subjects and testing on unseen subjects.The key challenge is to suppress subject specific variability in BTS representations.Most existing methods implicitly suppress the variability through model building or subject adversarial learning, but rarely model it explicitly.We introduce spectral drift as a new perspective to characterize subject specific variability.Specifically, BTS signals under the same label often share consistent oscillatory structure, yet exhibit subject-dependent magnitude or phase shifts in specific frequency components, which we interpret as subject-specific variability. Building on this insight, we propose BioFormer.At its core is a Frequency-Band Alignment Module(FBAM) that generates band-wise modulation factors from the spectral distribution and adaptively adjusts amplitude and phase to align spectral structure, thereby mitigating variability.We further pair FBAM with Sample Conditional Layer Normalization, which infers normalization parameters from intrinsic signal statistics rather than subject identity, stabilizing cross-subject representations.Extensive experiments on six datasets demonstrate that BioFormer outperforms 12 baselines, yielding absolute F1-score improvements of 6%.