Selection of Heart Sound Segments for Synchronous Classification of Multi-channel Heart Sounds

Cardiac auscultation remains the most cost-effective screening procedure for cardiovascular diseases, and requires listening at the four main auscultation spots. Despite this, automatic heart sound analysis algorithms mostly classify patients using a single heart sound (single-channel), or, when using more than one (multi-channel), analyze each channel individually. To our knowledge, no prior work classifies patients through the synchronous analysis of multi-channel heart sounds, following the procedure used by physicians. This motivates us to study whether synchronous multi-channel analysis outperforms single-channel approaches, and whether it holds an advantage over asynchronous multi-channel methods that analyze channels one by one, potentially by capturing inter-channel interference phenomena. To answer these questions, we introduce a selection algorithm that identifies optimal heart sound segments from each of the four auscultation spots, which are then fed into a multi-input CNN that classifies patients by analyzing the four selected sounds simultaneously. Our synchronous approach, combining the proposed selection algorithm with a multi-input CNN, achieves a superior overall accuracy of 96.5\%, a 9.1\% gain over the best-performing single-channel and asynchronous multi-channel methods. The benefit of the proposed segment selection strategy over random selection is confirmed by a paired statistical significance test ($p = 0.003$). These results were obtained on 735 patients from the CirCor DigiScope dataset with complete recordings from all four spots, and their scope and generalizability are discussed in light of this and other methodological considerations.

Comparing Spectrogram Front-Ends for Abnormal Heart-Sound Detection with a Convolutional Neural Network

Heart disease kills a lot of people, and one cheap way to catch it early is by listening to heart sounds with a stethoscope, or better yet, just recording them and running them through a model. This project is a binary classification task: take a short clip of someones heartbeat and decide if it sounds normal or abnormal. Instead of trying out a bunch of different models, we kept the CNN the same the whole time and just changed how we turned the raw audio into a picture for it to look at. We tried three ways of doing that: a regular logmel spectrogram, PCEN (which basically normalizes each frequency bin over time), and a multi resolution version that stacks a few different window sizes together. We ran all three on the PhysioNet 2016 heart-sound dataset with the exact same setup but same model, same optimizer, same random seed. Turns out all three do pretty well at catching abnormal cases (sensitivity around 0.95), but PCEN and multi-resolution both edge out the plain logmel on the official PhysioNet accuracy metric (0.915 and 0.916 vs. 0.910). We also ran Grad-CAM to see where the model was actually looking, and it mostly focused on the low frequencies where S1 and S2 heart sounds live, which is a good sign that it learned something real