Xiangyu Yin, Tatjana Paunesku, Letonia Copeland-Hardin +7cs.CV
Registering images acquired with different microscopy modalities is essential for relating complementary measurements of the same specimen. In correlative X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and optical microscopy, the XRF map often covers only a small region of an optical image acquired from the same or an adjacent tissue section. Field-of-view (FOV) localization is necessary but can be difficult when appearance and structure differ across modalities. Here we evaluate training-free vision language model (VLM) localization on two datasets representing same-section high-correspondence and adjacent-section low-correspondence imaging. We test unconstrained and metadata-constrained search and compare VLMs with geometric controls, classical template matching, and two alternative training-free approaches (DINOv2 and multiGradICON). Direct VLM prompting produced content-dependent spatial signals but was not reliable alone. Classical matching was most accurate when cross-modal structure was preserved but failed in the low-correspondence collection. A proposal-and-verify workflow used repeated VLM predictions as candidates and image-based similarity to select the final location. This workflow recovered useful localization in the low-correspondence regime.
Xiangyu Yin, Tatjana Paunesku, Letonia Copeland-Hardin +7cs.CV
X-ray fluorescence (XRF) microscopy maps elemental distributions, while optical microscopy can provide complementary morphological context. Localizing XRF fields of view (FOVs) in optical images is difficult because the two modalities differ in contrast mechanism and resolution. Most current workflows place each XRF tile independently, even when acquisition metadata already record the tiles' relative scan positions. This study formalizes XRF tile-group localization, in which one optical-frame placement is estimated for the whole group, constrained by acquisition geometry and quantified using group intersection-over-union (GroupIoU). In a controlled case study, independent localization failed with GroupIoU 0.000, whereas group localization achieved 0.931. Replacing the normalized cross-correlation (NCC) metric with mutual information (MI) gave nearly identical results, showing that the outcome is not specific to one local similarity metric. In another multiscale case study, using a coarse XRF survey scan to connect the fine-scale tile group to the optical image increased mean GroupIoU from 0.694 to 0.856. These case studies support using acquisition geometry as an explicit constraint when localizing related XRF tiles.
Medical image segmentation is essential for modern computer-aided medicine. Recently, text-guided segmentation has shown promise by incorporating clinician-formulated textual reports as semantic guidance for image segmentation. These textual reports contain language descriptions about the appearance, location, and neighboring anatomy of segmentation targets, providing explicit guidance for target localization and delineation. Existing text-guided segmentation methods typically extract textual semantics implicitly through a pretrained text encoder and then integrate vision-language semantics via straightforward image-text feature fusion. However, these methods do not explicitly capture target-oriented information embedded in textual reports, particularly target location, and do not explore multi-level information fusion strategies beyond basic feature-level fusion, limiting the extraction and integration of critical textual semantics. In this study, we propose LoG, a localization-infused vision-language fusion framework for text-guided medical image segmentation. By jointly performing multi-scale target localization tasks, LoG explicitly captures target-oriented vision-language semantics and enables three-level localization-infused semantic fusion: (i) localization-guided feature fusion that directly infuses location-relevant semantics into visual features, (ii) localization-gated attention fusion that redirects multi-scale localization predictions to reinforce critical regions, and (iii) localization-constrained loss fusion that supervises segmentation based on spatial consistency with target localization. Extensive experiments on three well-established benchmark datasets, involving three medical imaging modalities with paired textual reports, demonstrate that LoG consistently outperforms state-of-the-art medical image segmentation methods.
Jonathan Schwartz, Utz Heinrich Ermel, C. Braxton Owens +6eess.IV cs.CV cs.DL cs.LG physics.bio-ph
Cryo-electron tomography (cryoET) has emerged as a powerful tool in structural and cellular biology by enabling direct visualization of macromolecular structures within intact cells, thereby linking molecular architecture to cellular organization in a native context. Realizing the full potential of cryoET, however, increasingly depends on advances in computational analysis, particularly machine learning (ML), to interpret its complex and information-rich data. Despite rapid progress, ML development for cryoET remains bottlenecked by the lack of standardized, well-annotated benchmarks. Existing evaluations are typically small, task-specific, and are assembled in isolation, limiting robust comparisons across methods. Here, we present POPSICLE, a benchmark suite for cryoET segmentation and macromolecular localization built from the CryoET Data Portal - an open, ML-ready repository of tomographic data, metadata, and annotations. POPSICLE spans eukaryotic and prokaryotic systems, both purified and fully in situ samples, and dense voxel-wise segmentation as well as sparse localization tasks. Built on a living data resource, it can expand as new datasets and annotations become available. Baseline experiments reveal substantial variation in model rankings across tasks, underscoring the need for benchmarks tailored to the unique characteristics of cryoET rather than evaluation practices adapted from adjacent biomedical imaging domains. POPSICLE thus provides an open and extensible foundation for reproducible ML evaluation in cryoET.