Prototype Adaptation for Zero-Shot sEMG Movement Classification

Surface electromyography (sEMG) enables the control of prostheses, allowing upper-limb amputees to re-gain some hand function. Most current research focuses on recognizing basic movements for prosthesis control. However, in most daily activities, such as opening a door, combined movements are essential. However, collecting training data for all possible combined movements is time-consuming and requires re-training of the model for any new combination. We propose two novel recognition approaches, Compositional Prototype Interpolation (CPI) and Synthetic Adaptation for Prototypes (SAP), that enable zero-shot learning of combined, novel and unseen movements in Prototype Networks after training only with basic movements. Our methods rest on a linear interpolation assumption in the embedding space, which we study by inspecting the geometry of combined motions in signal and embedding space. In experiments on the NearLab and NinaPro DB3 data sets as well as our newly recorded BasCom dataset, our proposed SAP outperforms prior zero-shot learning methods with accuracy improvements on combined movements of more than 20%. This advantage is maintained in online inference experiments in a user study.

Classifying daily activities needs posture, reconstructing them needs motion

Humans recognize movements effortlessly, even from noisy and complex visual input. But what information in the stimulus allows humans to rapidly classify movements? No framework has systematically compared different strategies of movement analysis to address this question. Here, we used videos of 16 daily activities from the MoVi dataset and compared three strategies: Temporal Movement Primitives (TMPs), which decompose movements into weighted sums of temporally smooth basis functions; Legendre polynomial coefficients, which project joint-coordinate trajectories onto an orthogonal polynomial basis; and Autoencoder latent embeddings. Legendre coefficients and TMPs achieved the highest classifier accuracy, followed by autoencoders. We found two discriminative features for movement classification. The most informative is the general posture of the body, the average spatial configuration that distinguishes one activity from another. Additionally, we identified 9 critical joints that are most predictive for movement classification. Interestingly, good classification accuracy did not automatically lead to good movement generation: when we reconstructed movements for each activity, TMPs preserved the temporal dynamics and produced perceptually natural motion, whereas reconstructions from Legendre coefficients retained only the average posture and appeared frozen. These results reveal a dissociation in how movement information is organized: the static configuration of the body suffices to classify what activity is performed, but the temporal dynamics of movement are required to reconstruct how it unfolds. This distinction clarifies which features the visual system may rely upon for rapid action recognition, and suggests that postural features could enable efficient movement screening in clinical applications, while dynamic information remain essential wherever movement generation is the goal.