ToxLens: A Reproducible Graph-Learning Framework for Leakage-Aware, Uncertainty-Calibrated Molecular Toxicity Prediction

Molecular toxicity prediction is increasingly used to prioritise compounds before experimental testing, but conventional benchmark performance can overstate practical utility when structurally related molecules occur across training and test folds. We introduce ToxLens, a reproducible multi-task graph-learning framework for 11 toxicity endpoints spanning Ames mutagenicity, acute oral toxicity, hERG inhibition, and Tox21 nuclear-receptor and stress-response assays. The workflow combines conservative chemical curation, sphere-exclusion filtering, a leakage-aware UMAP-HDBSCAN split, parallel graph and global-feature encoders joined by late concatenation, temperature-scaled Monte Carlo dropout with conformal-style prediction sets, applicability-domain analysis, and SHAP-guided toxicophore discovery with occlusion controls. On the leakage-controlled test fold, a five-seed soft-voting ensemble achieved a Matthews correlation coefficient score of 0.44, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve score of 0.83, and an area under the precision-recall curve score of 0.58. It exceeded four ECFP4-based shallow baselines on all 11 endpoints under the same split and validation-based threshold-selection protocol. Controlled ablations showed that the global pathway was important, whereas late concatenation outperformed the tested gated and feature-wise linear modulation fusion variants. Conformal-style prediction sets revealed substantial endpoint-specific variation in set efficiency, and discrimination and calibration improved with similarity to the training domain. Retraining on fixed published Tox21 Challenge and TDA folds produced competitive, but not uniformly state-of-the-art, performance. SHAP-guided occlusion and consensus subgraph mining yielded model-derived structural hypotheses, 44 of which contained at least one occurrence that passed the predefined counterfactual criteria.

MolSafeEval: A Benchmark for Uncovering Safety Risks in AI-Generated Molecules

Current molecular generation benchmarks emphasize task complexity, molecule novelty, and property alignment; they largely overlook a critical concern: the potential safety risks of AI-generated molecules. In practice, many generative models may produce molecules with toxic, reactive, or otherwise hazardous characteristics - posing hidden dangers that remain insufficiently addressed. To address this gap, we introduce MolSafeEval, a benchmark dedicated to evaluating and analyzing the safety risks of molecular generation. Unlike prior approaches that rely on narrow toxicity predictors, MolSafeEval integrates heterogeneous safety knowledge - ranging from toxicological databases to hazard rules - into a structured molecular safety knowledge graph. This graph serves as a foundation for large language model-based reasoning, enabling systematic detection and explanation of unsafe features in generated compounds. We further categorize molecular generative models into four representative task types - unconditional generation, property optimization, target protein-based design, and text-based generation - and provide standardized datasets and safety evaluation protocols for each. By systematically revealing the safety vulnerabilities of current generative approaches, MolSafeEval offers a new lens for benchmarking molecular models and provides essential guidance toward safer, more trustworthy molecular design.

An explainable hypothesis-driven approach to Drug-Induced Liver Injury with HADES

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a leading cause of late-stage clinical trial attrition. However, existing computational predictors primarily rely on binary classification, a framing that limits generalization and yields no mechanistic insight to guide translational decisions. We argue that DILI prediction is better posed as an explainable hypothesis-generation problem. To support this shift, we introduce the DILER Benchmark, a dataset that extends beyond binary labels by augmenting a curated set of molecules with mechanistic hepatotoxicity hypotheses derived from biomedical literature. We further present HADES, an agentic system designed to generate transparent and auditable reasoning traces. By combining molecular-level predictions, metabolite decomposition, structural understanding, and toxicity pathway evidence, HADES mechanistically assesses DILI risk. Evaluated on the DILER Benchmark, HADES outperforms existing models in binary classification, achieving a ROC-AUC of 0.68 on the Test Set and 0.59 on the challenging Post-2021 Set, compared with 0.63 and 0.50 for DILI-Predictor, respectively. More importantly, we establish a baseline for mechanistic hypothesis generation, where HADES achieves a Hypothesis Alignment Fuzzy Jaccard Index of 0.16. This result underscores the inherent complexity of the task while highlighting the need for advanced explainable approaches in predictive toxicology.