Static Pruning Across Sparse Retrieval Regimes: What Transfers, What Breaks, and What Still Helps

Static pruning is widely used to accelerate sparse neural retrieval, yet existing studies each validate their conclusions within a single custom pipeline, leaving it unclear which findings transfer to modern engines with different index organizations and dynamic pruning mechanisms. We present the first cross-engine pruning portability study, evaluating static pruning strategies across three engines - a controlled C++ pipeline (exhaustive inverted index), BMP (block-max pruning), and SEISMIC (clustered inverted indexes) - on two benchmarks (MS MARCO, Natural Questions) with two encoders spanning opposite query-density regimes (SPLADE: 44 avg. query terms; V3-GTE: 7 avg. query terms), totaling 1,140 experimental configurations, with an additional deep-judgment validation on TREC DL 2019/2020. We find that index-side pruning (document and posting-list) is portable: it consistently reduces latency (1.2-6.6$\times$) and index size (18-82%) across all engines because sparse retrieval is memory-bound - a conclusion we support with cache-miss, TLB, and IPC profiling. In contrast, query pruning is already internalized by modern engines: it yields 4-11$\times$ speedup on the exhaustive pipeline but is subsumed by BMP's $β$ and SEISMIC's query_cut. Static pruning complements dynamic pruning: on BMP, combining document and query reduction yields 2.5$\times$ speedup with NDCG@10 within 0.003 of the exact baseline. Finally, NDCG@10 saturates while Recall@10 is still in the ${\sim}$85-95% range across all three engines, providing a portable stopping criterion: practitioners can push pruning to this knee without visible ranking degradation. Together, these findings answer what transfers (index-side pruning), what breaks (query pruning), and what still helps (static atop dynamic pruning).

Query Expansion Should Be Coordinated: Dense Expands, Sparse Anchors

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems rely on retrieval modules to ground large language model (LLM) outputs. LLM-based query expansion enriches retrieval with document-like passages, but evaluations of hybrid retrieval often fuse fixed top-L prefixes of dense and sparse rankings. Because L controls cross-channel contributions and ranking access, it can alter measured expansion gains. We therefore evaluate complete-list effectiveness and record per-channel replay stopping depths required to certify the ordered top-K. This changes the design: because both rankings determine the fused result, their query constructions should be coordinated rather than designed independently. We present DESA (Dense Expansion and Sparse Anchoring), which shares generated references across channels but specializes their integration. Orthogonal residual expansion adds new semantic directions to the dense query, whereas score-product anchoring reorders the original sparse support without admitting expansion-only matches. The same references thus play complementary roles: Dense expands; Sparse anchors. Across seven BEIR datasets, DESA improves nDCG@10 and Recall@20 over the unexpanded query by 3.82% and 2.38%, while reducing dense and sparse replay stopping depths by 36.90% and 36.56%.

Sparse Coverage: Semantic Center Representations for Patent Prior-Art Retrieval

Patent prior-art retrieval is a recall-oriented search task over long and highly structured technical documents. Dense retrieval improves semantic matching, but single-vector representations may compress multiple technical components, functions, and constraints into a single embedding. We propose Sparse Coverage, an unsupervised semantic retrieval framework that maps local span embeddings to a sparse vocabulary of embedding-space centers. The centers are selected with a coverage-oriented k-center objective, and spans activate nearby centers to produce sparse representations compatible with inverted-index retrieval. Experiments on CLEF-IP 2013 show that Sparse Coverage matches or exceeds the document-level recall of strong dense patent encoders in several configurations, while remaining competitive for passage-level retrieval. By combining local semantic evidence with sparse inverted-index search, Sparse Coverage provides an effective first-stage retrieval approach for patent search.