Adaptive Utility driven Resource Orchestration for Resilient AI (AURORA-AI)

Modern AI systems are increasingly deployed under non-stationary computational, demographic, and operational conditions in which static resource allocation strategies degrade both predictive performance and human-centric properties such as fairness and explainability. This paper presents AURORA-AI, an Adaptive Utility-driven Resource Orchestration framework for Resilient AI that unifies Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman feedback control, Lyapunov-based stability monitoring, and a fairness-aware composite utility into a single closed-loop policy.The framework continuously redistributes computational budget across a population of heterogeneous AI models so that the global utility, defined jointly over predictive performance, demographic parity, cost, latency, robustness, and interpretability, remains maximised under disruption. The framework is evaluated in a stress-rich discrete-time simulation that concurrently injects demographic bias shocks, gradual concept drift, and abrupt black-swan disruptions, and is compared against five established controllers including Static, Round Robin, Greedy, LinUCB, and a deep reinforcement-learning agent based on Proximal Policy Optimisation. AURORA-AI achieves immediate recovery from the black-swan event compared to eighty-eight time steps for the Static baseline and twenty-two for Proximal Policy Optimisation, lifts the alpha-quantile and the super-quantile by twenty-nine and twenty-five percent respectively, simultaneously reduces the mean and maximum demographic parity gap, and increases the fraction of Lyapunov-stable operating steps. These results indicate that fairness-aware adaptive orchestration grounded in stability theory is a practical and theoretically motivated path toward resilient human-centric AI deployment.

SpecKV: Adaptive Speculative Decoding with Compression-Aware Gamma Selection

Speculative decoding accelerates large language model (LLM) inference by using a small draft model to propose candidate tokens that a larger target model verifies. A critical hyperparameter in this process is the speculation length~$γ$, which determines how many tokens the draft model proposes per step. Nearly all existing systems use a fixed~$γ$ (typically~4), yet empirical evidence suggests that the optimal value varies across task types and, crucially, depends on the compression level applied to the target model. In this paper, we present \textbf{SpecKV}, a lightweight adaptive controller that selects~$γ$ per speculation step using signals extracted from the draft model itself. We profile speculative decoding across 4~task categories, 4~speculation lengths, and 3~compression levels (FP16, INT8, NF4), collecting 5,112 step-level records with per-step acceptance rates, draft entropy, and draft confidence. We demonstrate that the optimal~$γ$ shifts across compression regimes and that draft model confidence and entropy are strong predictors of acceptance rate (correlation~$\approx 0.56$). SpecKV uses a small MLP trained on these signals to maximize expected tokens per speculation step, achieving a 56.0\% improvement over the fixed-$γ$=4 baseline with only 0.34\,ms overhead per decision ($<$0.5\% of step time). The improvement is statistically significant ($p < 0.001$, paired bootstrap test). We release all profiling data, trained models, and notebooks as open-source artifacts.

Hierarchical adaptive control for real-time dynamic inference at the edge

Industrial systems increasingly depend on Machine Learning (ML), and operate on heterogeneous nodes that must satisfy tight latency, energy, and memory constraints. Dynamic ML models, which reconfigure their computational footprint at runtime, promise high energy efficiency and lower average latency for modest accuracy tradeoffs; however, their deployment is complex due to the additional hyperparameters they rely on. These hyperparameters, controlling the accuracy versus average latency tradeoff, are often tuned on a calibration dataset that must match the test time distribution, an assumption that rarely holds in real-world scenarios, leading to suboptimal operational conditions, possibly below static models. We propose a two-tier adaptive architecture that co-optimizes model and system decisions. At the global level, a scheduler configures and deploys, for each edge node, a cascade of classifiers composed of lightweight specialized models and a generalist fallback, satisfying latency and memory constraints. At the node level, a local controller tracks data drifts and hardware resources, enabling or disabling specialized predictors (SP) to preserve high energy efficiency and avoid latency-constraint violations under varying conditions. This design allows longer operating times without forcing a global redeployment step, and enables efficient execution in case of an unreachable remote global controller. We evaluate the approach on two datasets under controlled distribution mismatch scenarios, showing average per-inference reductions of latency up to 2.45x and energy up to 2.86x, with less than 4% accuracy drop compared to static baselines. Our contributions are:(1) a budgeted SP-cascade formulation that preserves worst-case latency constraints;(2) a hierarchical controller that maintains efficiency under data and resource changes; and (3) an experimental evaluation on embedded hardware.