From Accuracy to Visual Dependence: Auditing and Filtering Modality Collapse in Traffic VideoQA

High benchmark accuracy does not guarantee genuine use of visual evidence. We study this problem in traffic accident Video Question Answering (VideoQA), where correct answers should depend on scene-specific visual evidence but may instead be inferred from textual shortcuts. Through an audit of four public benchmarks, we find that several recent open-weight Vision-Language Models (VLMs) perform competitively, and sometimes better, without video input. On the MM-AU benchmark, removing video consistently improves accuracy, and adding more frames further degrades performance. To quantify visual dependence, we introduce two dataset-level diagnostics: Blind Gap, measuring above-chance text-only performance, and Visual Gain, measuring the marginal benefit of adding video. We further propose an instance-level Shortcut Score that combines text-only confidence with visual necessity signals, enabling continuous, training-free filtering of shortcut-prone questions. The resulting subsets reduce shortcut bias and improve visual grounding. Our findings reveal large differences in grounding quality across benchmarks and show that visually grounded evaluation, not just high accuracy, is essential in safety-critical VideoQA.

Counterfactual Reasoning for Fine-Grained Evidence Disentanglement in VideoQA

Recent advances in video multimodal models have significantly improved VideoQA performance. However, these systems often rely on spurious statistical correlations rather than answer-relevant causal evidence, resulting in unfaithful and brittle reasoning, especially in complex real-world scenarios. Existing methods either rely on cross-modality correlations, costly curated training resources, or insufficient causal assumptions and constraints, and typically operate at the time-interval level. As a result, they fail to explicitly disentangle causal visual cues from confounders and provide limited fine-grained evidence localization. To address this issue, we propose a Counterfactual Reasoning framework for fine-grained Evidence Disentanglement (CREDiT). CREDiT formulates the VideoQA process using a structural causal model and learns cross-modality representations that are explicitly decomposed into causal and non-causal components under independence and minimality constraints. To facilitate faithful disentanglement, we introduce feature-level causal interventions and construct counterfactual inputs that approximate causal effects while suppressing non-causal correlations. Extensive experiments on NExT-GQA, SportsQA, and SPORTU-video demonstrate that CREDiT consistently improves answer accuracy and reasoning reliability across both generic and complex sports scenarios, leading to more trustworthy VideoQA systems.