Action-Aligned Retrieval with Pairwise Multimodal Reranking for Text-Based Person Anomaly Search

Text-based person anomaly search requires distinguishing individuals based on fine-grained, context-dependent behaviors rather than mere appearance. Existing methods struggle to capture these context-conditioned actions, frequently relying on isolated skeletal geometry, discarding raw query details during reformulation, or utilizing absolute pointwise scoring for multimodal verification. To address these limitations, we propose \textbf{ActPair}, a unified three-stage coarse-to-fine framework that combines action-aligned retrieval with pairwise multimodal reranking to bridge the pose-semantic gap. First, we fine-tune a vision-language model (VLM) with an action-aligned multi-task objective that encourages the representations to encode action-discriminative semantics. Second, we perform parallel late-fusion retrieval using the original query and a large language model (LLM)-generated context-grounded rewrite, retaining complementary details from both semantic views. Finally, we propose an efficient off-the-shelf reranking module that leverages a pivot-promote algorithm to perform direct pairwise visual comparisons, mitigating residual spatial and compositional ambiguities without the prohibitive inference costs of exhaustive evaluation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework achieves the best results among the compared methods on the Pedestrian Anomaly Behavior (PAB) public test and transfers effectively to an unseen, non-anomaly-specific dataset.

What's the Catch? Evaluating Temporal Consistency in Vision-Language Models

Vision-language models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on video and image-sequence benchmarks, yet it remains unclear whether they capture temporal structure. To study this question, we formulate temporal grounding as an anomaly detection problem, providing a simple and controlled evaluation that directly tests sensitivity to temporal consistency. We introduce TimeCatch, where temporal anomalies are created by swapping consecutive frames and frame-level anomalies by replacing a frame with Gaussian noise. Models are evaluated on anomaly detection and localization tasks across four synthetic and real-world datasets, alongside a human study. Our evaluation reveals a substantial gap between frame-level and temporal anomaly detection. While VLMs consistently detect frame-level anomalies and often localize them accurately, they perform near chance on temporal anomaly detection and only modestly above chance on localization. Humans, in contrast, achieve near-ceiling performance on both tasks. Additional analyses across model scales, prompting strategies, sequence lengths, and visual similarity suggest that these failures cannot be explained solely by limitations in perception or model capacity. Together, these findings indicate that current VLMs can identify anomalies within individual frames but struggle to integrate information across frames to reason about temporal consistency. TimeCatch provides a controlled benchmark for evaluating temporal grounding in vision-language models.

Multi-Modal Anomaly Detection: A Survey

Multi-Modal Anomaly Detection (MMAD) detects rare abnormal events from heterogeneous data sources and is increasingly used in safety- and reliability-critical applications such as industrial inspection and cybersecurity. Yet the literature is fragmented across domains and modality combinations, and existing surveys usually group methods by architecture rather than by how abnormality is defined and separated in multi-modal settings. We survey MMAD from an assumption-driven perspective. We formalize the problem, identify five intrinsic characteristics underlying its core challenges, and organize prior work into two complementary paradigms. The first, normality-assumption methods, models regularity via representation learning, cross-modal alignment, and knowledge enhancement. The second, anomaly-assumption methods, sharpens decision boundaries through coarse-grained, structural, and semantic anomaly injection. We also investigate how foundation models are reshaping MMAD through scalable pretraining, flexible cross-modal transfer, and emerging reasoning capabilities. Finally, we compile representative benchmarks and evaluation protocols across domains and highlight open problems and future directions for robust, adaptive, and interpretable MMAD systems.

Heterogeneous Vision-Language Ensemble with Disagreement-Aware Reranking for Text-Based Person Anomaly Retrieval

Text-based person anomaly retrieval aims to retrieve pedestrians exhibiting anomalous behaviors from a large image gallery using natural language descriptions. Compared with conventional text-based person retrieval, this task requires fine-grained reasoning over pedestrian appearance, behaviors, object interactions, and scene context, making robust cross-modal matching significantly more challenging. This paper presents the GENAI4E team's solution to AI City Challenge 2026 Track 4. Our framework builds upon a strong retrieval backbone and progressively integrates heterogeneous vision-language embedding models through score alignment and iterative ensemble fusion, followed by disagreement-aware VLM reranking for ambiguous queries. On the official Pedestrian Anomaly Behavior (PAB) benchmark, our approach achieves 90.92% mAP, 85.13% Recall@1, 97.72% Recall@5, and 98.68% Recall@10, demonstrating the effectiveness of combining complementary vision-language representations with selective multimodal reasoning for large-scale text-based person anomaly retrieval.

Understanding and Overcoming Cross-modal Fusion Bias in Multimodal Anomaly Detection From A Fisher Information Perspective

Current advancements in Multimodal Anomaly Detection (MAD) are largely driven by enhancing multimodal fusion, particularly through the integration of RGB and Depth data for richer anomaly representation. However, less attention was devoted to analyzing the role of cross-modal fusion bias, a well-known challenge in multimodal learning, in MAD. This gap motivates a key question: can we overcome this bias to break the performance bottleneck of current work? In this paper, we first analyze the impact of cross-modal fusion bias in MAD via the Fisher Information Matrix. Then, grounded in these findings, we propose UCFB, a simple yet effective plug-and-play framework designed to mitigate cross-modal fusion bias in MAD. It achieves this by jointly employing Fisher-information-guided dynamic calibration to adjust modality-specific regularization weights and canonical similarity analysis to improve inter-modal interactions. Extensive experiments on the MVTec 3D-AD and Eyecandies datasets demonstrate that UCFB achieves consistent improvements in single-class, multi-class, and few-shot settings.

Evaluating VLMs for Autonomous Agent-Driven Geometry Clipping Detection in Video Game QA

In this work, we study the use of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for anomaly detection in an agent-driven game Quality Assurance (QA) pipeline focusing on geometry clipping. In this evaluation, a custom exploration agent navigates a game level to collect visual observations, while the automatic annotation pipeline provides frame-level clipping labels. This setup allows us to evaluate recent VLMs on a controlled anomaly detection task without manual annotation. We benchmark six recent VLMs (Gemini, GPT, Qwen, Gemma, Llama, and Ministral) under a zero-shot prompting setting and analyse their sensitivity to four prompt variants. Our results show that while the VLMs can capture visual cues associated with geometry clipping, they all produce substantial false positives on visually ambiguous frames such as near-contact geometry and partial occlusions. Gemini-3.1-Flash achieves the best overall accuracy and is the most robust to prompt variation, while open-source models exhibit large precision--recall swings depending on the prompt design. These findings suggest that current VLMs are best suited as high-recall candidate filters within multi-stage QA pipelines rather than as standalone bug detectors.

Hazard or Anomaly? Evaluating VLMs for Understanding Dangers and Discrepancies

Modern safety-critical systems increasingly rely on human-robot interaction to reduce disaster risk and support decision-making during emergencies. Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are promising for these settings because they can interpret complex scenes and communicate safety-relevant information, but they still require careful evaluation to ensure reliable safety reasoning. In particular, current evaluations often frame danger recognition as a binary decision (Safe/Unsafe), making it unclear whether a model is identifying true physical hazards or merely reacting to unusual scene elements. We address this limitation by introducing an explicit distinction between hazard and anomaly, and by separately recognizing hazardous and anomalous states. We evaluate several state-of-the-art VLMs across two datasets and multiple prompting strategies to test whether this distinction changes model behavior. Our results show that VLMs frequently misinterpret anomalousness as hazardousness, revealing an over-reliance on contextual irregularity as a proxy for danger. We further show that explicitly separating anomaly from hazard provides a more informative evaluation of VLM safety reasoning and exposes failure modes that binary safety judgments can obscure. Our public dataset is available on Roboflow https://app.roboflow.com/vlm-in-context-anomaly-and-hazard-detection/camera-ready-roman-ds.

Forewarned is Forearmed: When Non-Sequential Embedding Turns Into an Anomaly Detector

This paper offers an in-depth analysis of non-sequential multimodal sentence-level embeddings, with a particular focus on the SONAR model. We demonstrate that certain embedding dimensions are sensitive to perturbations and can serve as indicators of decoding anomalies. By leveraging the consistency between successive encoding and decoding, we successfully build an accurate detector. Additionally, we explore modifying specific dimensions of interest to attempt to correct them. This work underscores the importance of understanding and analyzing the embeddings themselves to enhance the reliability of multimodal representations.

RobustMAD: Evaluating Real-World Robustness of Multimodal Small Language Models for Deployable Anomaly Detection Assistants

Multimodal industrial anomaly inspection assistants are a critical component of next-generation smart factories, enabling interactive vision-language-based querying. However, multimodal large language models remain impractical for on-site deployment due to prohibitive computational demands and privacy risks from cloud-based inference. Compact multimodal small language models (MSLMs) offer a deployable alternative, yet progress is constrained by the lack of comprehensive robustness analyses and meaningfully challenging benchmarks that reflect real-world industrial conditions. To address this gap, we develop RobustMAD, the first deployment-motivated benchmark, designed to comprehensively evaluate model robustness through diverse open-ended queries spanning object understanding, anomaly detection, unanswerable problems, and visual quality degradations. Contrary to conventional assumptions, top-performing MSLMs exhibit promising capabilities, surprisingly outperforming even the larger GPT-5 Nano. However, they still fall short of safety-critical requirements, and RobustMAD reveals critical robustness gaps that pose operational risks. In particular, three recurring failure modes emerge: (i) fragile multimodal grounding under fine-grained distinctions or degraded visual conditions, (ii) insufficiently comprehensive responses, and (iii) weak logical grounding on unanswerable or ill-posed queries, leading to hallucinated outputs. Grounded in these insights, we provide actionable guidance for the design of next-generation multimodal industrial inspection assistants that leverage their promising competence. Code is available at https://github.com/en-research/RobustMAD.

LADBench: A Benchmark for Logical Fault Detection in Images

Large Vision Language Models (VLMs) excel at visual question answering and semantic grounding, but their capacity for autonomous logical reasoning remains underexplored. Existing anomaly benchmarks emphasize visual errors or direct prompting rather than the physical and social common sense needed for open-world deployment. To address this, we introduce LAD-bench, a benchmark of more than 1,000 curated synthetic images with logical anomalies across four domains: Residential, Urban, Collaborative, and Nature. We further propose a Tiered Prompting Protocol based on progressive disclosure, which measures how much explicit assistance a model needs to localize and reason about a logical fault. Evaluating leading foundation models reveals substantial weaknesses: even the best achieves only 70.11% overall accuracy, showing that implicit logical fault detection remains unsolved. Crucially, models often fail to identify anomalies even after receiving explicit hints in deeper tiers. By surfacing these limitations in sequential multimodal reasoning, LAD-Bench offers a rigorous framework for advancing the safety, reliability, and cognitive alignment of autonomous visual systems. Dataset and Code: https://huggingface.co/datasets/SahasraK/LADBench