Reliable disaster damage assessment requires models that provide both accurate predictions and transparent explanations. However, existing multimodal approaches are limited by scarce annotated data and insufficient evaluation of reasoning quality. This study proposes a two-stage training framework that integrates Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) within a unified data construction pipeline. From a single Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) annotation workflow, two complementary datasets are derived, namely ReasoningSet, which contains validated rationales for SFT, and PreferenceSet, which comprises paired rationales for DPO-based alignment. The framework evaluates both classification performance and explanation quality using automatic metrics, model-based scoring, and human ranking. Experimental results show that SFT improves accuracy from 73.64% to 78.29% and increases Macro-F1 by 29% compared to the baseline, while explanation quality improves by approximately 25%. Subsequent DPO alignment further enhances interpretability on the PreferenceSet. Cross-model validation on InternVL-3-8B and LLaVA-1.5-7B demonstrates the robustness and generalizability of the approach. The proposed framework improves detection of underrepresented mild damage cases, reduces high-risk misclassifications, and strengthens alignment between model reasoning and human judgment. Overall, it provides a reproducible pathway to develop reliable multimodal systems that deliver auditable, actionable disaster insights for emergency management.
Ravi K. Rajendran, Biplob Debnath, Murugan Sankaradas +1cs.CV cs.CL cs.IR
Timely and accurate assessment of property damage is critical following natural disasters. Traditional on-site inspections are labor-intensive, costly, and often pose safety risks. Advances in satellite imagery and vision-language models (VLMs) enable scalable remote damage assessment; however, integrating VLMs into large-scale Earth observation pipelines presents challenges in computational efficiency, data organization, and information retrieval. To address these challenges, we present DamageScope, a retrieval-augmented framework that combines satellite imagery with Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate property damage analysis. Built on a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework, DamageScope extracts structured visual representations from satellite imagery to support interactive natural language queries for damage assessment. To address scalability, we introduce a novel multi-vector embedding-based clustering algorithm that outperforms traditional single-vector embedding approaches while reducing indexing time by up to 14x. Furthermore, a dual-store data architecture minimizes LLM API calls, reducing both operational cost and response latency by up to approximately 3x. By effectively balancing scalability and operational efficiency, DamageScope provides a robust and practical solution for real-world damage assessment tasks.
Due to the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme climate events, there is a clear demand for intelligent, scalable, and autonomous approaches to disaster damage assessment. Existing methods, largely based on supervised learning and task-specific fine-tuning, struggle to generalize under domain shifts, long-tailed data distributions, and heterogeneous geospatial data sources, especially in disaster scenarios. They also often lack the ability to integrate and reason across multimodal geospatial information, such as satellite images and street-view images. In this paper, we introduce RAPID, a reproducible multi-agent pipeline for interpretable disaster damage assessment, including damage-level assessment, damage-type interpretation, and actionable suggestions for response, remediation, and recovery. RAPID coordinates specialized agents to perform cross-view understanding, image restoration, structured damage recognition, and geographical reasoning across heterogeneous data modalities. Without task-specific fine-tuning, RAPID supports zero-shot damage assessment by jointly using complementary information from remote sensing and ground-level perspectives. The system produces fine-grained, interpretable assessments and automatically generates location-specific, decision-relevant disaster reports to support early-stage emergency response. We evaluate RAPID across hurricanes, floods, wildfires, and earthquakes using multiple cross-view imagery inputs, including pre- and post-disaster street-view images, post-disaster remote sensing imagery, and street-view image pairs. Experiments show that RAPID achieves 0.92 overall accuracy for multi-disaster type classification and up to 0.627 for cross-view damage severity prediction, highlighting its potential as a foundational framework for autonomous disaster intelligence.