Direct Image-to-Modern Vietnamese Translation of Han-Nom Manuscripts via Multimodal RLHF Preference Alignment

Translating Han-Nom manuscripts into modern Vietnamese is challenging because historical pages are often degraded, the script contains rare logographic characters, and parallel supervision is limited. We propose a multimodal RLHF preference-alignment framework that conditions Vietnamese generation on manuscript images and aligned Han-Nom source text. The model combines four streams: CLIP ViT-L/14@336 for visual features, bert-base-chinese for Han-Nom representations, vinai/phobert-base for Vietnamese representations, and T5-small encoder states. Modality-specific projections and a fusion block compress the resulting 2,048-dimensional concatenation into a shared 512-dimensional representation. Starting from the same supervised fine-tuned policy, we compare PPO, DPO, and KTO under matched work-level macro-averaged evaluation. DPO achieves the best BLEU-4, ROUGE-L, BERTScore, semantic similarity, CER, WER, and token accuracy, whereas PPO obtains the highest precision, recall, and F1. KTO remains competitive through its desirable-undesirable utility objective. All preference-aligned policies improve the BLEU-4 and semantic-similarity scores available for the SFT baseline. These results indicate that multimodal preference optimization complements supervised learning by improving lexical and semantic quality in low-resource historical translation.

When Simpler Is Better: Evaluating Translation Pipelines for Medieval Latin Manuscripts

Despite remarkable progress in machine translation, Vision Language Models (VLMs) struggle on historical manuscripts, a domain that stresses core Natural Language Processing (NLP) capabilities: low-resource transliteration, archaic vocabulary, and noisy input signals. We present a systematic framework for evaluating the full image-to-translation pipeline on medieval Latin manuscripts, a setting in which scribal shorthand, ligatures, and parchment degradation expose failure modes that are invisible in clean-text benchmarks. Benchmarking on the CATMuS Latin dataset reveals a specialization gap: domain-specific Optical Character Recognition (OCR) models reduce character error rate by up to 4.3$\times$ compared to general-purpose VLMs, despite operating at orders of magnitude fewer parameters. We introduce the Interpres-Parallel-Corpus (IPC), a novel dataset comprising 1,383 aligned manuscript image lines, transcriptions, and expert translations, the first of its kind for medieval Latin. Our experiments uncover a complexity paradox: the simplest pipeline, a specialized OCR model feeding directly into a VLM, outperforms all multi-component variants. Adding retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) or post-OCR correction introduces prompt saturation and error propagation that degrade aggregate translation quality. These findings offer both a new benchmark and practical guidance for deploying translation systems in low-resource historical settings.