Mapping Written Words to Spoken Words in a Different Language Using Only Visual Grounding

In many low-resource settings, even just eliciting speech for data collection is difficult. One promising approach has been to ask speakers to describe images. But how do we build models from such visually grounded speech data? Given a dataset of images with Hindi spoken captions, we consider how we can map a written English keyword to spoken realisations of that word in Hindi. Previous work trained end-to-end multimodal neural models. Instead, we explore a simpler alignment-based approach built on self-supervised speech representations. Written English tags are automatically obtained from images using off-the-shelf image captioning systems. Hindi utterances associated with the same keyword are then aligned (using self-supervised features), and alignment evidence is aggregated to identify recurring speech segments corresponding to the target word. Experiments evaluating keyword spotting and localization show that our alignment-based approach outperforms a previous attention-based neural model. We also show the benefit of incorporating negative examples during alignment. Our work demonstrates that cross-lingual word-to-speech mappings can be learned directly from visual grounding without transcriptions or explicit model training.

Discriminative Axis, Not Data Volume: What a Contrastive Corpus Teaches an Audio Embedding

Scaling the corpus is the default remedy when a contrastive representation lacks an attribute. We report a case where it does nothing, and identify what does: adding a lexical-speech round to a frozen-base multimodal embedding model raises zero-shot keyword spotting by 76 points while reducing speech-emotion recognition by 14. The loss is not a capacity limit: fine-tuning on 7,442 clips from a prosody-controlled corpus recovers emotion past its pre-speech level at a five-point keyword cost. Nor is it data volume: 29,428 mined clips whose captions explicitly name emotions, at matched exposure, move emotion by -0.0007. The difference is structural: a contrastive objective encodes an attribute only when the in-batch negatives cannot be separated without it; the controlled corpus holds sentence content fixed, so prosody is the only separating signal, whereas mined captions name emotion yet remain separable by scene content. Intervention on the same audio confirms causality: raising caption similarity does not recover emotion, but collapsing caption diversity so that emotion becomes the only separating axis recovers it by 8.9 points across three seeds, with a smaller, same-signed gain on a non-acted corpus, while keyword accuracy trades back. Corpus structure, not size or caption vocabulary, controls what a contrastive audio embedding encodes.

Connecting Speech to Words through Images

How can we learn the mapping between written words and their spoken counterparts in the absence of explicit textual supervision? We present a visually grounded method for building a vocabulary of spoken words using only images and their spoken descriptions. First, image captioning systems are used to build a vocabulary of written words representing salient visual concepts in the images. For each word, we then find utterances whose image captions contain that word. Then we use an unsupervised word discovery technique to align these utterances to locate instances of the target word. The result is spoken word segments that are linked to written words -- all accomplished without any text supervision. In spoken word retrieval and keyword spotting experiments, the proposed approach outperforms a strong neural baseline while being more interpretable. These results demonstrate the feasibility of the approach in English and motivate future work on low-resource languages without transcripts.