Rethinking Modality Reliability in Multimodal Sentiment Analysis with Incomplete Observations

Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA) integrates text, audio, and vision to infer human affect, yet real-world multimodal observations are often incomplete. Existing methods for incomplete-observation MSA mainly follow two paradigms. Reconstruction-based methods recover missing information from observed modalities, while joint-representation methods learn directly from incomplete inputs. Although effective, these methods usually treat modality reliability only implicitly within representation learning or fusion design rather than modeling it explicitly. We argue that modality reliability is a central variable in incomplete-observation settings. Failure to model it explicitly gives rise to two related issues. The first is reliability mismatch, in which the affective evidence retained by each modality varies across samples and missing rates. The second is reliability propagation bias, in which messages from degraded modalities may adversely affect cross-modal interaction and predictive performance. To address these issues, we propose MRCF, a Modality Reliability-Calibrated Framework for MSA with incomplete observations. MRCF contains a Reliability-Aware Branch that estimates sample-specific modality reliability from intramodal quality cues and cross-modal semantic consistency, a Reliability-Guided Interaction Branch that uses the estimated scores to modulate cross-modal information flow, and a Reliability-Calibrated Fusion Module that integrates reliability and semantic cues for final prediction. Experiments on CMU-MOSI, CMU-MOSEI, and CH-SIMS show that MRCF achieves strong performance under standard incomplete-observation protocols. Further analyses provide evidence that explicit reliability modeling helps mitigate reliability mismatch and reliability propagation bias during interaction and fusion.

Adaptive Modality Reliability Diagnosis and Restoration for Robust Multimodal Intent Recognition

Multimodal intent recognition combines linguistic, acoustic, and visual evidence, but individual modalities may be noisy, missing, semantically conflicting, or disproportionately dominant. Existing methods typically infer modality importance implicitly and either reweight or suppress unreliable inputs, without determining whether a degraded modality can be repaired and subsequently trusted. We propose PRIME (Precision-weighted Reliability Inference and Modality rEstoration), a closed-loop reliability guided framework that jointly diagnoses, restores, and reassesses modality quality at the sample level. PRIME represents the weakness of each modality through a contextual log-variance estimated from complementary diagnostic evidence, including predictive confidence, epistemic disagreement, cross-modal consensus, and feature degeneracy. Because modality-reliability annotations are unavailable, the estimator is explicitly trained using controlled modality corruption with known degradation severity, together with a heteroscedastic uncertainty objective. Rather than directly discarding an unreliable modality, PRIME uses its estimated weakness to control a prototype-conditioned variational restoration module that reconstructs the degraded representation from complementary modalities. Crucially, reliability is re-estimated after restoration, allowing the model to determine whether the repaired representation has become sufficiently trustworthy to contribute to prediction. The resulting post-restoration precisions are used for inverse-variance multimodal fusion. Experiments on multimodal intent-recognition benchmarks show that PRIME maintains competitive clean-data performance while improving robustness under missing, noisy, conflicting, and modality-imbalanced conditions.