Do Vision-Language Models Agree on the Affective Qualities of Shape? A Cross-Model Audit for Generative Design Interfaces

Generative design interfaces increasingly expose semantic controls that let users steer output with concepts such as "more elegant" or "more minimalist," typically encoded by a vision-language model (VLM). A practical question is whether state-of-the-art VLMs represent objects consistently in terms of the same concept. We audit 6 VLMs by ranking untextured 3D objects along Kansei adjective pairs, where Kansei describes affective impressions of product form, with each axis defined as the difference between the text representations of its two poles. Geometric pairs serve as positive controls, and pairs of unrelated adjectives establish an empirical null. Across 10 categories of ShapeNet database, affective axes converge above the null (mean pairwise rank correlation 0.36 vs. 0.14) but below the geometric ceiling (0.44). The agreement between models is partial and highly uneven: on the three axes shared by all categories, mean convergence ranges from 0.21 for bookshelves to 0.51 for jars. Convergence depends primarily on whether a category's representational variation aligns with the semantic direction being evaluated, rather than simply on how much the objects vary in shape overall. Cross-model convergence does not imply agreement with human judgments. Based on our findings, we implement a UI prototype that shows how the audit can inform which Kansei descriptors to expose as controls for a given object class and which to withhold.

Is the Geometry Doing the Work? An Operating-Point Audit of Hierarchy in Hyperbolic Vision-Language Models

Whether a hyperbolic representation model uses its geometry cannot be read off its curvature parameter: what matters is the dimensionless operating point $\sqrt{c}ρ$ and whether the radial and cone machinery is active there. We develop a battery of necessary-condition diagnostics and audit three published hyperbolic vision-language families -- MERU, HyCoCLIP, and PHyCLIP -- across released checkpoints and controlled interventions on a fixed GRIT snapshot, identifying three failure modes. First, curvature is not an active resource: the operating point stays near-Euclidean ($H(u)\approx 1$; no audited converged checkpoint reaches $\sqrt{c}ρ>1$), and releasing the curvature floor moves curvature and norms but keeps the operating point near-Euclidean, without substantial downstream degradation. Second, the cone and traversal machinery is measured inoperative: entailment cones are inactive, saturated, or misaligned, and graded traversal fails under controlled readouts, while directed radial depth is a bounded non-detection above shuffle-null controls at quantified sensitivity; the one surviving native-relation residual remains non-operative. Third, hierarchy-looking evaluations are underdetermined: taxonomy correlations are carried by angular distance, and coarse-retrieval gains track box/compositional supervision, not curvature. A mechanistic account explains why: the entailment objective admits a low-curvature, wide-cone shortcut, and a parameter-free aperture identity (cones saturate iff $\sqrt{c}ρ\le 2K$) locates the edge where every entailment-trained unclamped run settles; entailment-off runs show no arrest there. The shortcut is the dominant accelerator of collapse, not its sole cause. These formulations, as released, do not instantiate the radial/cone mechanism their geometry motivates; we distill the audit into a five-number geometry report for future hierarchy claims.