Identity-Aware Human-Object Interaction Motion Captioning

Existing human-object interaction (HOI) motion captioning methods typically describe what happens while referring to the subject using generic terms such as "a person" or "someone", without grounding the caption in subject identity. To address this limitation, we introduce Identity-Aware Human-Object Interaction Motion Captioning task. This task requires each generated caption to specify both the subject identity and the corresponding HOI motion. For example, the model generates "Sub_ID lifts the chair" rather than "A person lifts the chair". For this task, we design identity-aware HOI motion captions based on the BEHAVE and InterCap datasets. We further propose ID-HOINet, which learns from multi-view videos while supporting single-view identity-aware HOI motion caption generation. ID-HOINet contains two core components: Multi-View Identity-Motion Learning Module (MVIML) and Two-Stage Caption Rewriting Strategy (TSCR). MVIML learns from multi-view videos by modeling dependencies across temporal stages and camera viewpoints, capturing identity and interaction motion features. At inference, the TSCR first retrieves the subject identity and generates identity-agnostic HOI motion captions. TSCR then rewrites these captions with the predicted identity to produce the final identity-aware HOI motion captions. Experiments demonstrate that ID-HOINet achieves state-of-the-art performance. Code will be released upon acceptance.

Pretraining Reusable Inference Across Views with Synthetic Task Priors

Modern pretrained encoders make representations from heterogeneous views increasingly reusable, but the procedure that determines view utility and combines evidence is still relearned for each downstream task. Consequently, knowledge about view relevance, complementarity, reliability, and missingness is repeatedly discarded rather than transferred across tasks. We therefore reformulate multi-view learning as learning a reusable, task-conditioned inference procedure rather than a fixed fusion function. Based on this perspective, we propose SIMPLE, a prior-fitted multi-view in-context learner that predicts query labels by conditioning on a small labeled support set. Since existing real-world datasets cover only a limited range of view configurations and task structures, we construct a controllable synthetic task prior in embedding space. It generates diverse support-query episodes with varying class structures, shared and view-specific factors, representation geometries, cross-view dependencies, reliability levels, missingness patterns, and distribution shifts. A hierarchical inference architecture then performs reasoning within views, across views, and across support and query samples. Experiments on multi-view and multi-omics benchmarks demonstrate that the frozen variant of SIMPLE achieves competitive performance without updating the inference backbone, while lightweight adapter calibration attains leading performance on most evaluated datasets. Together, the results under frozen, one-shot, and missing-view settings support the central hypothesis that multi-view reasoning itself can be pretrained and reused, while lightweight adapter calibration provides task-specific alignment when needed.

When Does Explicit View Routing Work? A Controlled Study of Multi-View Graph-Text Alignment

Graph-text retrieval typically maps a graph and its description to a single embedding, even when a query concerns only one semantic aspect, such as a class label or molecular property. Multiple heads can separate these aspects, but a change in the query head may alter retrieval even when the wrong text is sent to that head. Such behavior demonstrates architectural channelization, not necessarily semantic routing. We examine the conditions under which this distinction can be resolved. Our controlled version of MV-GTA uses deterministic, verifiable text segments; isolated text encoders; view-specific graph heads; and relevance derived from external labels or RDKit descriptors. Correct routing and per-sample derangements form a causal test of whether retrieval depends on content. On BBBP and BACE, correct routing improves label and property nDCG by 0.305 to 0.685 over deranged training. The expected graph head exceeds the best wrong head by 0.303 to 0.453. Topology does not specialize consistently across the two datasets. In a matched three-seed comparison, one joint model obtains mean topology, label, and property nDCG of 0.720/1.000/0.877; three separately trained Single specialists obtain 0.633/0.976/0.859. Property paraphrase augmentation also improves unseen-template nDCG by 0.140 and 0.147 over a matched-exposure canonical control. Consistency and hard-template extensions, however, reduce canonical retrieval in some settings. The evidence is therefore limited to explicit, externally grounded label and property routing and observed multi-interface consolidation. It does not establish free-form routing, consistent three-view specialization, statistical equivalence to specialists, or superior downstream prediction.