Vision-language models (VLMs) deployed on consumer hardware must decide when to answer and when to defer, and that decision depends on having a confidence signal that tracks correctness. A practitioner with a fixed memory budget faces a choice between a small model at full precision, the same small model quantized, and a larger model quantized into the same footprint -- three configurations that push the confidence signal in opposing directions. We measure, on identical inputs, how model scale and 4-bit quantization affect two confidence signals in the Qwen2-VL family: the confidence a model states in natural language, and its own mean token probability over the answer it generates. Across 5,700 predictions spanning six realistic photographic degradations at three severities, we find that scale sharply improves the model's internal uncertainty signal (mean error-detection AUROC 0.80 to 0.98 from 2B to 7B) while its verbalized confidence stays weak and often at chance (mean 0.61 to 0.69): the gap between what the model knows and what it says widens rather than closes with size. We find that 4-bit quantization is nearly free for accuracy (-1.6 points) but expensive for the confidence signal (internal AUROC 0.95 to 0.80, and the verbalized-confidence parse rate collapses from 99% to 64%). For a fixed memory budget the recommendation is therefore to prefer a larger quantized model over a smaller full-precision one: 7B-4bit gives both the best accuracy and the best uncertainty signal (internal AUROC 0.98) of the three configurations that fit. We frame the results as selective-prediction operating points so they translate directly into a deployment recommendation, and we argue that error-detection AUROC, not calibration error, is the metric that exposes the difference between the two signals.
Efficient multimodal inference is increasingly constrained not only by model quality or FLOP count, but also by the cost of preserving, moving, routing, caching, and quantizing multimodal representations under latency, memory, and energy constraints. This paper reviews recent advances in efficient vision-language and multimodal large language models, covering visual token compression, video token management, KV-cache optimization, Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) routing, low-bit quantization, edge deployment, and hardware-aware benchmarking. We argue that these techniques cannot be treated as independent optimizations. Visual token compression alters downstream feature distributions and MoE routing decisions, routing behavior affects expert utilization and quantization sensitivity, quantized router logits influence expert assignment, KV-cache policies determine retained multimodal evidence, and hardware constraints often transform computational savings into memory and communication bottlenecks. We organize the literature around these interactions and identify key design trade-offs, including accuracy versus token budget, static versus adaptive compression, sparse routing efficiency versus expert collapse, and low-bit inference versus modality-specific degradation. Finally, we introduce Temporal Routing Consistency as a diagnostic for video MoE models and highlight open research directions in routing-aware compression, cross-modal cache management, hardware-aware co-design, and unified benchmarking for multimodal edge intelligence.
Deploying a vision-language model with full UI understanding on end devices has long been trapped between accuracy and efficiency: on one side is the accuracy bar for OCR, screen understanding, visual question answering, and element grounding; on the other is the strict compute, memory, and power budget of mobile chips. Existing work either trades one for the other, or stops at simulation without real-device validation. We present StepX-Edge, a 0.9B-parameter on-device UI vision-language model that resolves this tension through three-layer co-design of architecture, training, and deployment. Architecturally, UI-aware Layered Visual Encoding (ULVE) and a Progressive Dimensionality Projection (PDP) connector target the extreme aspect ratios and fine-grained perception of screens, while standard full attention throughout ensures native compatibility with mainstream mobile NPU operators. For training, the five-stage StepX-Curriculum framework is designed around our observation of mutual-promotion effects among UI subtasks, so that all four capabilities grow synergistically under a tight parameter budget rather than interfering. For deployment, a module-wise differentiated two-stage PTQ-to-QAT quantization scheme keeps the post-quantization accuracy loss within 1%. StepX-Edge achieves the strongest overall UI understanding among <=1B models, surpassing all 2B-2.3B baselines on ScreenQA (88.76 F1) and Chinese OCRBench v2 (57.25), and matching 1.3B-2.3B general VLMs on RefCOCO (92.0%) and OCRBench v1 (831) with far fewer parameters. After W4A16+KV8 quantization, the model runs stably on Snapdragon 8 Gen5 devices with ~0.84 s TTFT, 98 tok/s decode, and 1.4 GB peak memory. We will open-source the training data, the full training recipe, and the quantization deployment pipeline.