Verifier-driven self-DPO is a common recipe for self-improving production visual-language models. In this setup, a frozen verifier scores candidate generations, the top- and bottom-scoring candidates form a preference example, and DPO updates the learner. The deployment-time assumption is monotone: a stronger verifier should yield a stronger student. We show that this assumption can fail because verifier quality is highly task-specific. On a four-rung open-source verifier ladder across MathVista, MMMU, and BLINK, the same verifiers that are above-threshold and improve a Qwen-3-VL-2B student on MathVista become sub-threshold on MMMU, where their task-rubric accuracy drops to 8% to 23%. In this regime, every verifier we tested silently regresses the student, producing drops of 3.4 to 10.9 percentage points below the frozen baseline while the DPO training loss continues to decrease. The regression replicates on a second student, Qwen-2.5-VL-3B. Moreover, within the failure regime, damage is confidence-inverted: the more accurate-but-still-wrong verifier causes larger regression than a near-random verifier, suggesting that progress-gated replay amplifies confidently wrong preference pairs. We give a compact mechanistic explanation via a variance theorem for progress-gated replay and its direction-mismatch failure mode. The deployment message is operational rather than purely diagnostic: before running any verifier-driven loop, teams should measure target-task rubric accuracy, rank verifiers by target-task rubric quality rather than parameter count, and treat diminishing returns in above-threshold regimes as a verifier-side compute budget cap.
Personality assessment aims to infer stable traits from dynamic behaviors across modalities like language, voice, and facial expressions. Existing approaches often adopt a uniform multimodal fusion strategy for all personality dimensions, overlooking trait-specific modality preferences and causing cross-modal interference. To address this, we propose Traits Run Deeper, a novel personality assessment framework consisting of three components. First, the Multimodal Foundation Representation (MFR) module constructs personality-oriented inputs and incorporates psychology-informed semantic templates as anchors, enabling foundation models to capture trait-relevant behaviors. Second, the Trait-Specific Modality Fusion (TSMF) module employs an asymmetric fusion mechanism, allowing each dimension to selectively exploit different modality pathways to capture heterogeneous preferences while reducing cross-modal contamination. Third, the Distribution-Calibrated Personality Regression (DCPR) module mitigates label imbalance and central tendency bias through target distribution calibration, improving robustness and stability. Experimental results on the AVI Challenge 2026 validation set show that our framework reduces mean squared error (MSE) by approximately 25% compared with the baseline. Consistent improvements on the official test set demonstrate that our method achieves the best performance and ranks first in the AVI Challenge 2026 Personality Assessment Track. The source code will be made available at [https://github.com/MSA-LMC/TraitsRunDeeper](https://github.com/MSA-LMC/TraitsRunDeeper).