Streetscape quality has become a central concern in contemporary urban planning, particularly within the framework of the pedestrian-friendly 15-minute city, where walkability and public-space quality are increasingly recognized as key determinants of urban performance. However, assessing streetscape qualities across large suburban and peri-urban territories remains challenging due to the time and resource demands of conventional field surveys. This paper presents a planning-oriented assessment of streetscape qualities in the north-eastern periphery of Nice (France) using the latest release of SAGAI (Streetscape Analysis with Generative AI), an open-source workflow that leverages vision-language models (VLMs) for large-scale streetscape analysis from Google Street View imagery. The new release addresses limitations of the original framework through improved image acquisition, geographically consistent view generation, support for multiple VLM architectures, consensus-based inference, and an integrated analytical environment. The workflow is applied to several thousand street-level observations to evaluate qualities relevant to pedestrian-friendly urban environments: sidewalk presence, pedestrian entrance density, and vegetation. The resulting maps reveal that the desired streetscape qualities characterize only a fraction of today's suburban streetscapes, mainly in compact developments and traditional suburban faubourgs, while they are particularly lacking on residential hills. The analysis demonstrates the potential of contemporary VLMs to support urban diagnostics in extensive suburban territories where fieldwork would be prohibitively time-consuming. Beyond the case study, the paper illustrates how recent advances in vision-language models can contribute to evidence-based planning by enabling scalable, flexible, and interpretable assessments of urban public-space quality.
This research investigates the potential of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to infer building typologies: Construction, Current Use, and Storeys from Google Street View (GSV) images. Predictions generated by VLMs are compared with inference by human experts (civil engineers and architects) as a source of manually labelled ground-truth data. We evaluate several state-of-the-art VLMs, including GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 2.0 Flash. By applying different scaling strategies and prompting techniques, we found that Chain-of-Thought prompts provide an overall more stable model performance. We also investigate the reasoning behind VLMs' building-typology predictions by examining the probabilities of keywords appearing in AI explanations. This enabled us to analyse patterns in these reasonings and identify key themes driving both agreements and disagreements between VLM and expert labels. We find that AI tends to focus on visual indicators, whereas human experts place greater emphasis on broader contextual cues and domain knowledge, in addition to visual cues. Overall, VLM can approximate experts' capability in building-typology classification at scale, with an average accuracy of approximately 70%. The study demonstrates the VLM's potential for AI automation in tasks that require pattern recognition and object identification in an urban context. AI have the potential to serve as complementary and collaborative tools for urban analysis, leveraging their strengths in understanding visual patterns. This study contributes to the exploration of the efficiency and scalability of AI visual prediction and provides insights into the reasoning processes that could support automation processes in urban analysis and prediction.