IntroConformal: Conformal Factuality Guarantees for Large Vision-Language Models via Introspective Signals

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved strong multimodal performance, yet ensuring the factual correctness of generated content remains challenging. Existing methods that provide statistical guarantees on factuality typically rely on external verifiers or generation-time confidence signals, which introduce auxiliary dependencies or often fail for confident but incorrect outputs. We argue that reliable factuality control can instead be achieved through introspective signals derived from the model itself. We introduce IntroConformal, a training-free Conformal Risk Control (CRC) framework that provides finite-sample, distribution-free factuality guarantees. We first instantiate it with layer-wise semantic stability, a conformity score derived from hidden-state representations, and then propose verification probability, a stronger score capturing the model's self-administered judgment on claim factuality. Across multiple LVLM architectures, IntroConformal satisfies the conformal risk guarantee while substantially reducing abstention and achieving competitive or superior claim-level discrimination relative to external verifier-based baselines.

CRUISE: Vision-Language Model-Guided Uncertainty-Aware Cross-Modal Sensor Fusion for Robust Autonomous Driving

Modern autonomous vehicles are equipped with multiple sensors, such as cameras, LiDAR, and radar, for comprehensive environmental perception. However, robust cross-modal feature fusion remains a critical challenge, as the reliability of each sensor varies significantly across diverse real-world driving conditions, including poor visibility and adverse weather. While uncertainty quantification (UQ) mitigates this issue by allowing models to prioritize reliable signals, existing uncertainty-aware fusion methods typically rely on simple feature-level uncertainty estimates and thus often fail to generalize effectively in complex, out-of-distribution scenarios. To address this limitation, we propose CRUISE, a novel uncertainty-aware cross-modal sensor fusion framework. CRUISE integrates a vision-language model (VLM)-guided UQ module that generates fine-grained, pixel-level uncertainty estimates. By leveraging the VLM's rich prior knowledge and superior contextual reasoning, our approach provides a highly informative guide for the fusion process. Furthermore, we introduce a dynamic adaptive mechanism that explicitly models and captures cross-modal dependencies, ensuring the framework fully exploits the inherent complementary nature of multi-sensor inputs.

Dynamic Distribution-Aware Uncertainty Tracking in Vision-Language Representation Learning

Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) aims to measure the reliability of model predictions, serving as a critical safeguard for deploying Vision-Language Models (VLMs) in safety-critical scenarios. Post-hoc approaches are widely adopted due to their lightweight nature, mapping the outputs of VLMs to uncertainty measures through learnable modules or inductive summarization. However, Post-hoc approaches remain inherently confined to fitting the failure patterns of the source domain, ignoring the dynamic nature of test distributions. To address this challenge, we propose a Dynamic Distribution-Aware Uncertainty Quantification framework (DDA-UQ) that shifts the paradigm from static mapping to a dynamic distribution-aware process. During training, we leverage a Gaussian Mixture Model to model the VVLMs'embedding space and extract distributional evidence, thereby dynamically deriving uncertainty estimates. During inference, the design dynamically responds to changes in the data distribution. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

When Thinking Hurts: Epistemic Signals in the Reasoning Chains of Visual Language Models

Uncertainty quantification for visual language models (VLMs) conventionally targets the answer token distribution. We provide the first three-family empirical characterisation of answer entropy behaviour in thinking-mode VLMs. Running four models on identical POPE adversarial samples, we find three qualitatively distinct patterns: Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking shows complete collapse (ans H AUROC = 0.492); GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking shows no collapse (0.716); and InternVL3-8B shows selective thinking (chains on only 50% of samples, ans H = 0.675 full / 0.602 thinking-only). Across all three thinking-mode models, thinking chain entropy outperforms answer entropy on the subset where chains are generated (0.647, 0.759, 0.608 vs. 0.492, 0.716, 0.602 respectively), suggesting chain signals are the more reliable predictor whenever chains are present. This holds strongly for Qwen and GLM, but with only marginal and statistically unreliable advantage for InternVL3 (n_FP = 17). A 300-sample VQAv2 pilot confirms chain entropy (0.680) outperforms answer entropy (0.595) on VQAv2 questions, with the gap largest for free-form answers (0.733 vs. 0.467). On harder reasoning tasks (HallusionBench) both Qwen models show moderate signal (approx. 0.64), consistent with incomplete pre-commitment on difficult questions. We additionally document structured abstention affecting 12-22% of queries with asymmetry toward absent-object queries, and a practical abstention gate raising accuracy from 71.0% to 93.8% at 62.7% coverage with no additional inference cost.

Does It Fail to See or Fail to Know? Attributing Errors in Vision-Language Models

Vision-language models (VLMs) perform well on visual question answering with high-quality images but struggle when questions require knowledge beyond what is clearly and directly visible. In such settings, uncertainty quantification should not only indicate whether the model is likely to fail but also diagnose why it is uncertain, across dimensions such as perception, entity recognition, and knowledge retrieval. While prior work has focused on individual failure modes in isolation or treated incorrect answers as monolithic failures, we propose a unified framework for disentangling these failure modes and investigate whether pre-generation signals can predict these failure sources. Across a range of datasets and model families, we find a consistent pattern in VLM errors: some failures arise from visual or recognition bottlenecks, while others persist after the relevant entity is identified. Our main finding is that these failure sources can be predicted before decoding: recognition-related failures are best captured by visual-token representations, while failures that remain after recognition are better captured by prompt-conditioned hidden states. This pre-generation signal enables efficient failure-source prediction before the model produces an answer, allowing uncertain cases to be routed to targeted interventions such as image repair, entity recognition support, or external retrieval.

FUSE: Quantifying Uncertainty in Vision-Language Models by Bayesian Fusing Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty

Vision-language models (VLMs) are playing an increasingly important role across multiple domains. In many applications, such as robotics, it is crucial to quantify the uncertainty in the output of these models. } We develop FUSE, a probabilistic framework for capturing two complementary sources of uncertainty in vision-language modeling: (i) aleatoric embedding-level uncertainty derived from input data vision-language ambiguity, and (ii) epistemic model-level uncertainty estimated from the semantic response diversity of VLMs. Our approach formulates a Bayesian fusion mechanism that analytically combines these uncertainty sources to produce a scalar measure of uncertainty. This measure can be used to reliably predict the model's output correctness for downstream applications. We demonstrate that our method outperforms baselines and achieves SOTA uncertainty calibration.

VLM Judges Can Rank but Cannot Score: Task-Dependent Uncertainty in Multimodal Evaluation

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used as automated judges for multimodal systems, yet their scores provide no indication of reliability. We study this problem through conformal prediction, a distribution-free framework that converts a judge's point score into a calibrated prediction interval using only score-token log-probabilities, with no retraining. We present the first systematic analysis of conformal prediction for VLM-as-a-Judge across 3 judges and 14 visual task categories. Our results show that evaluation uncertainty is strongly task-dependent: intervals cover ~40% of the score range for aesthetics and natural images but expand to ~70% for chart and mathematical reasoning, yielding a quantitative reliability map for multimodal evaluation. We further identify a failure mode not captured by standard evaluation metrics, ranking-scoring decoupling, where judges achieve high ranking correlation while producing wide, uninformative intervals, correctly ordering responses but failing to assign reliable absolute scores. Finally, we show that interval width is driven primarily by task difficulty and annotation quality, i.e., the same judge and method yield 4.5x narrower intervals on a clean, multi-annotator captioning benchmark. Code: https://github.com/divake/VLM-Judge-Uncertainty