Dongsheng Hu, Tianyi Zhang, Chuang Liu +3cs.HC cs.AI
Asynchronous Video Interviews (AVIs) have become increasingly popular for personality assessment. Recent large language models (LLMs) have shown potential for personality assessment from transcribed interview responses. However, text-centered methods may overlook non-verbal behavioral cues conveyed through visual and audio modalities, even though such cues are highly relevant to personality assessment. In particular, emotion-related cues provide important social and affective evidence for understanding candidates' behavior related to personality traits. Thus, we propose EMMR (Emotion-Mediated Multimodal Reasoning), a two-stage framework for MLLMs-based personality assessment for AVIs. EMMR extracts emotion-related cues from multimodal interview data and incorporates them into personality assessment through structured reasoning as auxiliary social and behavioral evidence. Experiments on two AVIs datasets, OPVA and AVI-6, show that EMMR improves MAE, MSE, and PCC compared with baselines. Further analysis indicates that semantic descriptions of emotion cues enhance personality assessment, while their quality affects personality assessment reliability. These results suggest that integrating emotion-related cues into multimodal reasoning is a promising direction for more interpretable MLLMs-based personality assessment in AVIs.
Personality recognition in asynchronous video interviews (AVIs) has become increasingly important due to their widespread adoption in modern recruitment. Existing approaches often rely on large language models (LLMs) to analyze textual responses of interviewees in AVI. However, unimodel methods often suffer from information loss (e.g., ignore facial cues). In contrast, multimodal methods that employ full-face images or sparsely sampled frames can discard fine-grained temporal dynamics critical for accurate personality assessment. To overcome these limitations, we propose an LLM-based framework that semantically fuse facial action units (AUs) with textual responses of AVI. AU sequences are first converted into interpretable textual descriptions, which are then fused with participants' textual responses through an LLM. A lightweight regression head transforms the resulting embeddings into continuous personality scores without disrupting the underlying semantic space. Experiments on the AVI-6 benchmark demonstrate consistent improvements over most baselines, with lower prediction errors and stronger correlations with human-rated scores across multiple traits. Further analysis reveals that AU-derived semantic representations offer complementary non-verbal cues to textual responses. Decoupling semantic understanding from regression prediction within the LLM also leads to greater training stability and clearer interpretability. Overall, these findings demonstrate that AU-text fusion provides a psychologically grounded and computationally efficient framework for personality recognition in AVIs.
Predicting psychological traits from asynchronous video interviews (AVIs) is a challenging multimodal learning problem because labeled datasets are limited while each response contains high-dimensional visual, acoustic, and verbal signals. This paper presents our solution for the ACM Multimedia AVI Challenge 2026, which evaluates two tasks: Track~1 predicts self-reported HEXACO personality traits from personality-related interview responses, and Track~2 classifies cognitive ability levels from structured AVI responses. We treat the problem as a small-sample representation learning task. Instead of fine-tuning large pretrained models, we use frozen multimodal encoders, including CLIP for visual features, Whisper for acoustic features and transcripts, and RoBERTa, E5, and DeBERTaV3 for textual representations, followed by low-capacity downstream models. For Track~1, our trait-specific regression and late-fusion system achieves an average validation MSE of 0.2696, improving over the official baseline of 0.3334. Ablation results show a three-step improvement from a global model (0.3189), to per-trait modeling (0.2871), to per-trait late fusion (0.2696), corresponding to a 19.1\% relative MSE reduction over the official baseline. For Track~2, a compact subject-attribute baseline reaches 0.5781 accuracy, while our multimodal ensemble reaches 0.5313, both above the official baseline of 0.4062. We interpret this result as evidence of possible subject-attribute shortcuts in the validation split rather than robust cognitive inference from AVI content. Overall, our findings suggest that AVI-based psychological assessment benefits from trait-specific multimodal modeling, but cognitive ability prediction requires careful control of dataset shortcuts.