Can Graph Learning Learn Circuits?

Circuit localization is a mechanistic interpretability task whose goal is to identify a sparse subgraph of a transformer's computation graph sufficient to reproduce a particular behavior. Most established methods localize circuits independently for each model--task pair. We instead frame circuit localization as a graph machine learning problem in which the edges of a computation graph represent computational pathways, and graph neural networks (GNNs) model interactions among these pathways. We introduce Graph Circuit Learning (GCL), a supervised, amortized framework that trains a GNN across multiple model--task pairs and applies it to unseen cases. To provide sufficient data, we augment the InterpBench benchmark with additional cases derived from the TracrBench programs. Of the 14 evaluated GCL configurations, the highest scored a median edge AUROC of $0.902$ (interquartile interval $[0.861, 0.942]$) on the 16 original held-out InterpBench cases. This is close to the published InterpBench median of $0.910$ for EAP-IG while remaining below ACDC's $0.959$. Removing all message-passing edges reduces the median to $0.825$. We also adapt PGExplainer, a GNN explainability method, to circuit localization, obtaining a median edge AUROC of $0.858$ on the same cases. These preliminary results suggest that graph machine learning offers a natural and potentially powerful perspective on circuit localization, and we hope this perspective encourages closer exchange between the two communities.

Localizing Anchoring Pathways in Language Models

Irrelevant numbers in a prompt can shift language model judgments, producing anchoring effects in numerical reasoning. We study where this anchor-sensitive signal is carried inside language models using a controlled multiple-choice setup with shared answer options. We define a logit-difference metric comparing the correct answer option with the answer option corresponding to the anchor, and validate that it tracks behavioral anchoring. Using attribution-based circuit localization on 7B--8B Qwen and Llama base and instruction-tuned models, we find that edge-level methods recover this signal more faithfully than node-level methods. Low- and high-anchor circuits transfer strongly within a model, suggesting shared pathway structure across anchor direction. However, sparse transfer across base and instruction-tuned variants is less reliable, indicating that post-training changes which pathways matter most. Overall, our results provide a mechanistic account of how anchoring-related decision signals are carried inside language models.