"Don't Say It!": Constraints, Compliance, and Communication when Language Models Play Taboo

The game of Taboo requires describing a target word without using a set of forbidden words, so that other players can guess it. This deceptively simple task combines strict lexical constraints with the need for communicatively effective descriptions, making it a compelling playground for examining how LLMs navigate competing demands at inference time. We evaluate two open-weight models under conditions that intervene at progressively deeper levels of the generative process, from prompting to generation-time constraints to internal representations manipulations. We assess their outputs through forbidden word violation detection, LLM-as-a-judge measuring the degree to which generated descriptions successfully evoke the target concept for both human and machine guessers, and examining whether the strategies models adopt under constraint align with those of human players. Our results show that compliance with the rules of the game and communicative effectiveness trade off differently across conditions, and that models remain substantially weaker than humans as guessers, suggesting that lexical grounding under constraint is an open challenge for current language models.

Tractable Hierarchical Control of Autoregressive Language Models

Constraining the generation of autoregressive large language models (LLMs) is an important component of integrating language models into formal systems. In the generation of code and data for tasks like program synthesis, ensuring that language models produce syntactically valid output is a prerequisite for processing such output. These languages (such as SQL or JSON) are often designed as $LR(k)$ context-free grammars. By distilling the LLM to a tractable probabilistic model, its autoregressive generation can be steered and masked to incorporate the probability of satisfying logical constraints, ensuring high quality output that is guaranteed to be valid. This paper demonstrates that the satisfaction of any $LR(k)$ grammar of finite duration can be calculated in polynomial time, an improvement over the exponential time of applying previous methods to such grammars. This result enables efficient constraint and steering of LLM generation towards output that better satisfies formal syntactic constraints.