ROBE: Reversed-Order-Biased-Experts for Extracting Extreme Long-tail Events from Historical Texts

This paper proposes methods to extract over 50 types of events from a Dutch historical corpus spanning the 17th and 18th centuries. The methods we propose aim to tackle the impossible: extracting the long-tail of the long-tail. Historic data from before the 19th century is in itself a niche domain not covered in the pre-training of Large Language Models, and we aim to extract events only very scarcely annotated in the training data available for this domain. We propose creating expert classifiers for subgroups of the events present in the training data. We make these groupings based on similar frequency in the training data or on semantic relatedness. Experts trained on underrepresented events are assigned higher priority when predicting to avoid being dominated by frequency biases. We refer to this new way of combining classifiers, specifically tailored to protect the long-tail, as ROBE: Reversed-Order-Biased-Experts. We also propose a controlled method to create domain-specific synthetic data. Our two implementations of ROBE outperform a simple fine-tuned encoder model with a .10 increase in recall and a .16 increase in precision respectively. The best model achieves a .10 increase in f1 for a group of long-tail classes in our niche data set.

A Scalable Cross-Domain Event Extraction System via a Unified Generative Training Framework

Event extraction is fundamental to information extraction. Prior approaches often separate event detection and argument extraction or depend on dataset-specific designs, limiting scalability and cross-domain generalization. We propose a unified generative sequence-to-sequence framework that performs event extraction subtasks jointly and supports both pipeline and end-to-end configurations. We fine-tune pretrained language models on multiple event datasets across diverse domains, enabling a single model to retain domain-specific semantics while generalizing over large and evolving label spaces. We demonstrate these capabilities through a web-based application tailored for researchers and practitioners. The platform supports document upload, schema-aware event extraction, visualization of triggers and arguments, and comparison of different extraction configurations across domains.

A Multi-Domain and Multi-Task Generative Framework with Explicit Task and Domain Conditioning for Cross-Domain Event Extraction

Event extraction aims to identify event triggers, classify event types, and extract arguments to construct structured event representations. Despite strong in-domain performance, developing models that generalize robustly across domains remains challenging due to variations in contextual expressions and event schemas. Prior unified and multi-task approaches improve in-domain accuracy but exhibit limited flexibility when applied to unseen domains. Even large language model-based methods that provide full event ontologies at inference time often underperform compared to smaller, task-specific fine-tuned models. We propose a unified multi-domain and multi-task training framework that models heterogeneous event schemas within a single model. Our approach introduces domain conditioning signals, jointly with task-specific prompts, enabling dynamic adaptation to dataset-specific schemas without requiring complete event label sets at inference time. The framework supports both pipeline and end-to-end extraction settings, facilitating efficient task- and domain-level transfer. Experiments on diverse event extraction benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves competitive performance, strong cross-domain generalization, and practical scalability, while preserving domain-specific precision.

Schema-Constrained Document-Level Event Argument Extraction with Lightweight LLM Fine-Tuning

Event Argument Extraction (EAE) converts documents into structured event records by identifying argument spans and assigning them schema-defined roles. Document-level EAE is challenging due to long-range dependencies between triggers and arguments, cross-sentence context, and strict role constraints, which often lead to boundary errors, uncertainty in roles, and inconsistencies with restricted schemas. In this paper, we study whether mid-sized open LLMs can perform schema-constrained EAE reliably at the document level on MAVEN-ARG. Our approach combines (i) role-set injection in prompts for schema compliance, (ii) parameter-efficient supervised fine-tuning (LoRA) using the same JSON-only interface used at inference, and (iii) deterministic decoding with post-processing that validates JSON, filters invalid roles, de-duplicates arguments, and aligns spans to the document window. Under the official MAVEN-ARG evaluator, fine-tuned mid-sized open models outperform previously reported GPT baselines across mention, entity-coreference, and event-coreference evaluations; our best model (Phi-4, 14B) reaches 42.39\% F1 at the event-coreference level. Code to reproduce experiments is publicly available at https://github.com/dessertlab/EAE/.

Grounded Event Extraction from SEC 8-K Filings with a Fine-Grained Taxonomy

Form 8-K filings are the primary channel through which U.S. public companies disclose material events, but the SEC item codes attached to them are coarse: a single item spans routine administrative changes and chief executive departures, and many of the most market-moving disclosures fall into a catch-all item. Large language models make fine-grained labelling feasible at corpus scale, but only if the labels can be traced to the source text and shown to be reliable. We present a two-stage system that tags 8-K disclosures against a three-tier taxonomy of 119 event types. The first stage constrains output to valid taxonomy entries and anchors every tag to a verbatim quote via fuzzy n-gram validation; the second re-grades each cited quote against the category definition to produce a quality score. Applying the system to 292,984 filings from 2022 to 2026 yields 601,088 grounded event tags, which we release. Over 5,125 stratified tags, an LLM judge finds precision rises monotonically with the quality score, from 12% to 96%, while unsupported tags fall from 8% to near zero. Ablation shows the score is calibrated only when assigned in a dedicated second pass. An event study on unsigned abnormal returns confirms, without any language model, that the taxonomy separates economically distinct events sharing an item code.