JOR-Bench: Japanese Operations Research Benchmarks for Large Language Models

We present JOR-Bench, a collection of five Japanese-language benchmarks for evaluating the ability of large language models (LLMs) to formulate and solve operations research (OR) problems. Each benchmark is a Japanese translation of an existing English benchmark: IndustryOR, MAMO Complex LP, NL4OPT, OptiBench, and OptMATH, covering 1,319 problems spanning linear programming, mixed-integer programming, non-linear programming, and combinatorial optimization. JOR-Bench is a solver-independent benchmark that can be used with any solver or programming language, and consists of pairs of Japanese problem statements and expected numerical answers. We evaluate seven LLMs, including multilingual general-purpose models and Japanese-specialized models, on both the original English and the new Japanese versions, and compare performance across languages. For the main evaluation, we standardize execution with the Python interface to OR-Tools to make model outputs comparable and reproducible with open-source software. Our results show that OR formulation ability is largely language-neutral for strong multilingual models; the overall average accuracy difference between English and Japanese is only $-0.3$ pp. Yet error analysis reveals subtle cross-lingual differences, including a pragmatic disambiguation failure in some domains that causes models to output decision-variable values instead of the objective value when the prompt is in Japanese.

Uncertainty-Aware Simulation-Based Inference for Operations Research with Large Language Models

Deploying large language models (LLMs) for operations research (OR) tasks remains challenging because correctness depends on a coherent modeling process, not merely a correct final answer. Standard autoregressive generation operates on a myopic policy, which sometimes fails to anticipate whether a partial formulation can be validly extended into a globally consistent optimization model. Consequently, locally plausible steps may propagate into catastrophic downstream formulation or solver code errors. To address this, we propose an uncertainty-aware, training-free inference framework for OR mathematical modeling. Without updating model parameters, our method evaluates intermediate candidate steps using short lookahead simulations to quantify downstream predictive uncertainty or probability concentration. Candidates that demonstrate a higher likelihood of yielding coherent mathematical formulations are then dynamically selected via importance resampling. Empirical evaluations across multiple OR benchmarks (including NL4OPT, MAMO, and IndustryOR) demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms both standard and low-temperature baselines, establishing an efficient, training-free paradigm for reliable OR formulation generation.