Context-Aware Synthesis of Optimization Pipelines for Warehouse Optimization

Order fulfillment in manual picker-to-goods warehouses involves interconnected decisions such as item assignment, order batching, and picker routing. While integrated models capture interactions between these decisions, practical warehouse systems often require decomposed approaches due to organizational boundaries, differing responsibilities, or limited data availability. Existing studies primarily evaluate algorithms for isolated subproblems or fixed subproblem combinations for specific warehouse settings, but lack a general mechanism to determine applicable algorithm configurations, compose them into valid solution pipelines, and assess their performance. With Context-Aware Synthesis of Optimization Pipelines (CASOP), we propose a framework for constructing and evaluating context-specific optimization pipelines and apply these to order fulfillment. The framework comprises: (1) a modular repository of algorithms for common order fulfillment problems; (2) semantic data and algorithm cards to describe warehouse context and algorithm requirements; (3) a taxonomy that structures order fulfillment problems into relevant subproblems; (4) a pipeline synthesizer that identifies applicable algorithms for a given warehouse context and composes all valid optimization pipelines; and (5) a pipeline evaluator that assesses all resulting pipelines. We demonstrate the framework on 7 benchmark instance sets covering four problem classes, resulting in 1,063,044 valid pipelines. The framework supports researchers and practitioners in designing, automatically synthesizing, and selecting valid, high-performing algorithmic pipelines for warehouse operations. The software is open-source and available at https://github.com/kit-dsm/ware_ops_pipes and https://github.com/kit-dsm/ware_ops_algos. Keywords: Warehouse optimization, Algorithm selection, Pipeline synthesis, Order fulfillment

On the Influence of the Feature Computation Budget on Per-Instance Algorithm Selection for Black-Box Optimization

Per-instance algorithm selection (PIAS) takes advantage of complementarity between a set of algorithms by deciding which algorithm to run on a given instance. This decision is based on features of the instances, which, in the context of black-box optimization (BBO), require a part of the optimization budget to be computed. This raises two questions: (a) from which fraction of the budget spent on feature computation does PIAS become worth it for BBO, and (b) which fraction of the budget optimizes the tradeoff between feature accuracy and PIAS performance. To this end, we perform a broad study where PIAS with varying sampling budgets for feature computation is compared to the single best algorithm on a broad range of algorithm selection scenarios. These scenarios consist of two portfolio sizes, three problem sets, 4 dimensionalities, and 10 target budgets. We find that PIAS is viable for the majority of tested scenarios, even when as much as a quarter of the total budget is spent on feature computation. The tradeoff for the fraction of the budget spent on feature computation to maximize the benefit of PIAS is highly dependent on the specific AS scenario. Further, on average 20 percent of PIAS loss to the virtual best solver is explained by the budget spent on feature computation, highlighting the importance of properly accounting for the feature budget.