Pairwise reciprocal matrices are fundamental to the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a decision-making model. While the Direct Least Squares (DLS) method provides an intuitive mechanism for deriving priority vectors without complex transformations, the DLS provides multiple solutions. Under high levels of inconsistency, such as cyclic contradictions, this non-convexity yields multiple distinct global minima, resulting in unstable priority rankings that critically depend on initial algorithmic guesses. To overcome this structural deficiency, this paper introduces the Anchored Regularized Direct Least Squares (ARDLS) optimization model. ARDLS integrates uniquely determined established prioritization operators, such as normalization techniques, the Eigenvector method, Singular Value Decomposition, Cosine Maximization, and the Pseudo-Inverse Gram Matrix (the closed-form solution of Weighted Least Squares), as theoretical anchors within a regularization penalty. This integration systematically breaks mathematical symmetries, tilting the optimization landscape to guarantee convergence upon a single, unique global minimum. Comprehensive numerical experiments and simulations validate that the ARDLS framework successfully reduces root mean square error among established priority operators, while guaranteeing strict mathematical uniqueness. The proposed ARDLS may be the ideal alternative for the AHP applied to many application domains.
Pairwise comparison (PC) via pairwise reciprocal matrices (PRMs) is central to the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Although the traditional eigenvector method is widely applied to derive priorities, its theoretical robustness in reflecting true priority vectors remains debated. Building upon a previous iteration of this study, this research develops the revised Least Penalty-Squared Prioritization (LPSP) optimization models, including the revised Least Product of Penalty and Direct Squares (LPPDS) and revised Weighted Squares (LPPWS), to minimize the revised Root Mean Penalty-Squared Variance (RMPSV) and the revised Root Mean Penalty-Weighted Square Variance (RMPSWV). However, solving these non-linear formulations is computationally complex for decision-makers. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes the Parallel Osprey Optimized Least Penalty-Squared Prioritization (POO-LPSP) method. By integrating an improved bio-inspired metaheuristic Parallel Osprey Optimization Algorithm (POOA), this framework efficiently solves complex LPSP models to minimize RMPSV and RMPSWV, thereby enhancing prioritization reliability. The practical utility and computational efficiency of the POO-LPSP method are validated through a numerical application focusing on a Generative AI (GAI) vendor selection problem. To extend, POO-LPSP can serve as a robust alternative to Saaty's Eigen system method for AHP applications.