A Finite E-Group of Nilpotency Class Three

A group is an E-group if every element commutes with each of its endomorphic images. Caranti asked whether a finite E-group can have nilpotency class three. We prove that the $3$-group of order $3^{84}$ introduced by Abdollahi, Faghihi, and Mohammadi Hassanabadi, and later shown by Abdollahi, Faghihi, Linton, and O'Brien to have the corresponding automorphism property, is an E-group. Let $P$ denote this group and put $V=P/Φ(P)\cong \mathbb{F}_3^9$. The nine power relations of $P$ determine a linear map $q:V\longrightarrowΛ^2 V$. We prove that $q$ has no nonzero proper subspace $U$ satisfying $q(U)\subseteqΛ^2 U$. Since the image induced by any endomorphism of $P$ on $V$ has precisely this closure property, every endomorphism acts on $V$ either invertibly or trivially. The invertible case is the known A-group case. In the trivial case the image first lies in $Φ(P)=P'$, and the power relations then force it into $Ω_1(P')=Z(P)$. Thus every element commutes with every endomorphic image. The tensor rigidity is reduced to an exact finite calculation on the $9841$ points of $\mathrm{PG}(8,3)$.

An Exact Counterexample to Carlson's Associated-Prime Depth Conjecture from a Group of Order 128

In Question~3.1 of his 1995 paper on depth and transfer, Carlson asked whether the depth of a finite-group cohomology ring is always realized by the dimension of one of its associated primes. We give a negative answer. Let \[ G=\SG{128}{859},\qquad k=\kbar. \] An exact presentation certificate proves that $\depth H^*(G;k)=2$. Okuyama's associated-prime theorem would convert an associated prime of dimension two into a rank-two elementary abelian subgroup $E\leq G$ satisfying $\depth H^*(C_G(E);k)=2$. We enumerate all $75$ rank-two elementary abelian subgroups of $G$ and obtain six centralizer types. Duflot's theorem gives depth at least three for four types, while exact ideal-quotient certificates exhibit regular sequences of length three for the remaining two. Hence every rank-two centralizer has cohomological depth at least three, so $H^*(G;k)$ has no associated prime of dimension two. The finite group presentation, the three cohomology-ring presentations, the enumeration summary, and the exact algebraic certificates are included for independent verification.

Extremal Chowla sets and their linear analogues: A human-AI mathematical investigation using Co-Scientist

We introduce an extremal invariant associated with Chowla-type order conditions in finite groups. A nonempty subset $S$ of a finite group $G$ is called a Chowla set if every element of $S$ has order greater than $|S|$, and we write $C(G)$ for the maximum cardinality of such a set. We first show that $C(G)$ is determined by the distribution of element orders in $G$. For cyclic groups, we derive an exact divisor formula and characterize the integers $n$ for which $C(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})=\varphi(n)$. We prove that $\liminf_{n\to\infty}C(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})/\varphi(n)=1$, whereas $\limsup_{n\to\infty}C(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})/\varphi(n)=\infty$, and we determine the corresponding lower and upper limits under normalization by $n$. For finite abelian groups, we obtain an explicit formula in terms of the invariant-factor decomposition, together with a closed formula for finite abelian $p$-groups. We then develop a linear analogue for finite field extensions. A nonzero $K$-subspace $A$ of an extension $L/K$ is called a Chowla subspace if $[K(a):K]>\dim_K A$ for every nonzero $a\in A$. Since this condition depends on $\dim_K A$, it does not generally require every nonzero element of $A$ to generate $L$ over $K$. Nevertheless, when $L/K$ is finite and separable, we prove the exact formula $C(L/K)=[L:K]-d_{\max}(L/K)$, where $d_{\max}(L/K)$ is the largest degree over $K$ of a proper intermediate field. For finite fields, we give a direct proof in every degree using a normal-basis construction. This work was developed through an expert-guided human-AI collaboration. A reasoning-focused configuration of Co-Scientist was used to explore examples and potential proof strategies. The authors formulated the problem, independently verified and completed all arguments, and wrote the final proofs.