Adaptive Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization with Gradient Descent

Gradient injection helps Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) only when the swarm has identified a basin with smooth local structure, not universally. We propose Adaptive Hybrid PSO (AHPSO), which uses a sigmoid function on swarm diversity to automatically modulate gradient influence: near-zero during exploration, near-maximum during exploitation, with no manual phase-switching. Under budget-normalized comparison (PSO given equivalent total function evaluations), PSO wins 52.5% of 40 configurations versus AHPSO's 20% (p = 7.0e-5, Friedman). AHPSO retains advantage specifically on problems with smooth local basins (F8, F24-F27) where directed descent outperforms undirected sampling even at equal cost. Under iteration-matched comparison across 29 functions (42 configurations, 14,700 runs), AHPSO-Adadelta ranks first of 9 methods including CMA-ES (p = 9.75e-4). The contribution is a principled characterization of when gradient injection provides value in swarm-based search, not a claim of universal superiority.

Compositional Dynamics in Learning and Mechanics

We give a single compositional setting in which gradient-based learning and Hamiltonian-style mechanics appear as functorial semantics. The syntax is an operad Arr whose objects are input-output interfaces (pairs of manifolds) and whose morphisms are *smooth adaptive arrangements*, which consist of a responsive parameter space, a lens given by smooth output and input maps, and a real-valued potential. The main technical result of the paper is what we call *lens internalization*, a lax symmetric monoidal functor Lens(C) $\to$ C associated to any symmetric monoidal closed category C. Using it, we provide two functors $Φ_\text{phase}$, $Φ_\text{conf}$: Arr $\to$ PC into the 2-category of polynomial coalgebras -- input-output discrete dynamical systems -- which we take as the semantics category. $Φ_\text{phase}$ stores both position and momentum, whereas $Φ_\text{conf}$ stores only position. When applied to a parameterized function, $Φ_\text{conf}$ recovers the gradient descent training algorithm, with backpropagation as the lens' backward pass. When applied to harmonic particles wired together -- in series, or according to any finite directed graph -- one diagram yields two different regimes, both of which are governed by the graph Laplacian: $Φ_\text{phase}$ gives the discrete wave equation, which is conservative and second-order, and $Φ_\text{conf}$ gives the discrete heat equation, which is dissipative and first-order. They are two semantics of one adaptive arrangement, e.g. with the same potential in each case. And because Arr is an operad, such diagrams nest -- larger systems wired from smaller ones -- and each semantics assembles a system's dynamics functorially from its parts. These dynamics are moreover executable: a parameterized neural network and a graph of particles both compile, by the same construction, to explicit state machines one can run.

Quadratic integrate-and-fire neurons exhibit less fragmented loss landscapes and outperform leaky integrate-and-fire neurons in spike-based gradient descent

The ability to train spiking neural networks is essential for modeling biological neural networks as well as for neuromorphic computing. However, for the extensively used leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons, arbitrarily small parameter changes can induce spike (dis)appearances that disrupt subsequent activity, leading to unstable neural representations and permanently silent neurons during exact spike-based gradient descent. Recent work shows that a class of neuron models, which includes the quadratic integrate-and-fire (QIF) neuron, avoids these discontinuities and enables continuous and even smooth spike-based gradient descent. However, it remains unclear whether these advantages translate into practice. Here, we demonstrate that they do so via a controlled comparison between networks of LIF and QIF neurons on the popular Spiking Heidelberg Digits dataset. Specifically, in a first step, we perform a thorough hyperparameter search to optimize both models, revealing a clear performance advantage of QIF neurons. In a second step, we visualize the loss and gradient landscapes. Consistent with their inferior performance, we find that the loss landscapes of LIF neurons, which are discontinuous, appear more fragmented and the related gradients more erratic. An analysis of the landscapes of single samples indicates that these features arise from changes in the temporal order of spikes, which often cause disruptive spike (dis)appearances. Overall, our results advocate replacing LIF neurons with neuron models exhibiting continuous spiking dynamics, such as QIF neurons, for gradient descent training.