Yutong Jiang, Zahra Atashgahi, Carlos Soto Garcia Delgado +4cs.CV
Generating physically plausible 3D room layouts is essential for home furnishing retail, enabling customers to visualize products in their own homes and confidently make purchasing decisions. However, a gap exists between academic research and real-world application: existing solutions primarily focus on algorithmic strategies for furniture placement, largely neglecting the non-rectangular geometries and strict door/window constraints prevalent in real homes. To bridge the gap, we introduce a hybrid, hierarchical framework tailored for retail, specifically designed to support scalable spatial planning applications. Our system decouples generation into three stages: (1) functional furniture clustering and fine-grained intra-zone placement; (2) macro-routing guided by a vision-language model (VLM) to anchor both these clustered zones and any remaining standalone furniture within diverse polygonal boundaries; and (3) rule-based optimization for collision-free micro-arrangements that respect architectural constraints. We evaluate our system on production-scale catalogs and a representative set of irregular real-world topologies. Our results show that our approach attains the highest perceptual plausibility while maintaining good geometric compliance at relatively low latency, and extends to irregular boundaries that existing methods do not natively support.
Sharon Zhang, R. Kenny Jones, Jiajun Wu +1cs.GR cs.LG
We present a pipeline for building and aggregating task-specific, LLM-generated weak (imperfect) verifiers into a strong verifier for spatial layout domains. Given a task description, our pipeline asks an LLM to synthesize a collection of verifier programs using a layout verification DSL. Each individual LLM-generated verifier usually provides an imperfect check for a match between the layout and the corresponding task description. We show that by aggregating the responses of many such verifiers we can produce a stronger verifier. Moreover, by applying techniques from weak learning, our pipeline can learn how to aggregate the weak verifiers from a very sparse set of human labeled example layouts (about 10). We find that the strong verifiers produced by our pipeline outperform the status-quo approach of using a set of LLM judges to directly check whether a layout matches a task description, raising F1-scores by up to 7X across a variety of 3D room layout and 2D poster design tasks. We also demonstrate that verifier-guided layout generation using natural language feedback from our strong verifiers improves layout quality of a base layout generator by up to 66.2% according to a human evaluator.