SPLIT: Training-Free AI-Generated and Partially Edited Video Detection via Spatial Patch-Level Incoherence and Temporal Roughness

Deploying AI-generated video detectors in real-world services demands an ultra-low false positive rate (FPR) on real videos to avoid falsely rejecting authentic content, a regime where standard metrics such as AUROC fail to reflect actual operating behavior. We introduce Spatial Patch-Level Incoherence and Temporal Roughness (SPLIT), a training-free detector that operates on patch tokens from a frozen vision encoder to detect both fully generated and partially edited videos. SPLIT computes two complementary signals: Two-step Temporal Roughness (TTR), capturing non-smooth patch trajectories via one-step and two-step feature variation contrast, and Local Spatial Motion Incoherence (LSMI), measuring spatially inconsistent temporal changes through gradients of a feature-space motion field. The two are fused multiplicatively with gamma correction to sharpen real-fake separation at strict thresholds. We further propose a service-aligned evaluation protocol based on Fake Recall at fixed FPR with real-only threshold calibration and cross-real threshold transfer. Across three benchmarks (FakeParts, GenVideo, and ViF-Bench), SPLIT achieves the highest Fake Recall at FPR = $0.1\%$, substantially outperforming supervised and training-free baselines while remaining robust to post-processing with negligible overhead. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/mldljyh/SPLIT .

Explainable Forensics of Manipulated Segments in Untrimmed Long Videos

The rapid advancement of AI-driven video generation has transformed content creation, while simultaneously increasing the risk of misinformation through localized manipulations in long-form videos. Existing video forensic methods predominantly operate on short, independent clips, and thus fail to capture realistic scenarios where AI-generated content is sparsely embedded within otherwise authentic footage. To bridge this gap, we formulate the task of Temporal AI-Generated Segment Localization and Explanation, which targets authenticity detection, temporal localization, and interpretable analysis of manipulated segments in untrimmed long videos. We further introduce TASLE, a large-scale benchmark comprising 12,472 untrimmed videos with diverse manipulation patterns and rich annotation signals, including temporal boundaries, authenticity labels, and segment-level rationales. In addition, we propose MSLoc, a coarse-to-fine forensic baseline that combines a boundary-sensitive proposal generation module for efficient long-video scanning with an MLLM-based refinement module for precise boundary localization and interpretable reasoning. Experiments validate the effectiveness of the proposed baseline, highlighting the importance of segment-level explainable forensics for long-form AI-generated video analysis. Our dataset and code are publicly available at https://debby-0527.github.io/TASLE.

The Ghost Couple: Correlated LLM Name Priors and Their Haunting of the Web and Academic Publishing

These names do not exist. Elena Vasquez and Marcus Chen have appeared as volcano experts, astronauts, thriller protagonists, podcast hosts, and academic co-authors across hundreds of independently produced AI-generated documents, never having lived. We show that large language models do not merely default to high-probability individual names when generating fictional experts: they produce correlated character ensembles, pairs and trios whose co-occurrence rates far exceed chance and are consistent across independent generations. These priors are model-family-specific (Claude: Elena Vasquez + Marcus Chen + Amara Okafor; Gemini: Aris Thorne + Lena Petrova; GPT: Elara Voss with no fixed partner), version-specific, and actively suppressed at model release boundaries, leaving dateable behavioral fingerprints in the content they produced. We document a downstream consequence at scale. On Zenodo, a CERN-operated repository that mints real DataCite DOIs, we identify 1,655 ghost-authored records claiming nonexistent journals with fabricated publication dates: server-side DataCite timestamps prove deliberate backdating, and 991 records were registered in a single month; these carry real DOIs registered in DataCite, making them harvestable by any scholarly aggregator that ingests DOI metadata. Ghost names additionally appear on ResearchGate forming synthetic research groups with collaborators drawn from multiple model families; publication dates on these records provide a reliable temporal proxy for model deployment windows.