Jingyuan Wang, Richong Zhang, Zhijie Nie +2cs.IR cs.AI
Large language models (LLMs) can both expand underspecified queries and encode text as dense representations, suggesting a unified model for query expansion and retrieval. Existing systems usually rely on prompted expansions, independently trained modules, or staged optimization, leaving generated expansions only indirectly aligned with the retrieval loss that judges them. We train a single decoder-only LLM end to end, where the same model generates the expansion and encodes both the expanded query and candidate documents. This unified setting creates a moving-target problem: retrieval supervision should improve query-side expansion, but the same update also shifts the document embeddings that serve as retrieval targets. We introduce Document Embedding Preservation Tuning (DEPT), which keeps tuned document embeddings close to cached initial embeddings while allowing retrieval gradients to pass through straight-through decoding into the generator. DEPT converts joint query--document movement into query-side adaptation against approximately stable, whitened document embeddings that support index reuse and online hard-negative mining. Experiments with Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 and LLaMA-3.2-3B-Instruct on five datasets in BEIR benchmark show that DEPT improves average retrieval quality over training-free, independently trained, and staged unified baselines, while ablations isolate the effects of preservation, whitening, end-to-end expansion training, and online negatives. Code is available at https://github.com/ILSparkle/DEPT.
Raphaël Sourty, Antoine Chaffin, Paulo Roberto Moura Junior +1cs.CL cs.IR
State-of-the-art retrieval models increasingly rely on closed training data, creating a reproducibility gap. We present an open end-to-end recipe for training retrieval models and study how English supervision transfers to multilingual retrieval through translate-train. We first reconstruct and curate 665M English contrastive pre-training pairs from 1.4B pairs across 34 public sources and build 1.88M supervised fine-tuning pairs with mined hard negatives. Training yields two 149M-parameter models: DenseOn, a single-vector dense model, and LateOn, a ColBERT-style late-interaction model. They achieve 56.20 and 57.22 average nDCG@10 on BEIR, respectively, setting new state-of-the-art results for this size class. We then translate the validated English data into eight languages, yielding 2.8B pairs with cross-lingual samples, and train mDenseOn and mLateOn, two 307M-parameter models built on mmBERT-base. Despite sharing their backbone, data, and objectives, their representations behave differently: the dense model is strong on English and translated languages but degrades outside translate-train support, whereas the late-interaction model generalizes better to unseen languages and scripts. This suggests that token-level matching turns translate-train from a target-language expansion strategy into a multilingual generalization recipe. We publicly release the models, datasets, and training code.
RAG pipelines return a \emph{ranked list} of passages. We argue this is a mismatch: the downstream language model conditions on a \emph{set}, and the selection problem is fundamentally geometric. We propose \jko, which frames reranking as minimising a free-energy functional $F(p)=\text{relevance}+\text{entropy}+\text{redundancy}$ under Wasserstein-2 gradient flow via the Jordan--Kinderlehrer--Otto proximal scheme. The ground metric $C_{ij}=(1-\cos\langle z_i,z_j\rangle)^2$ encodes the semantic geometry of the embedding manifold. Our central contribution is a \emph{linear-response theory} explaining \emph{why} the Wasserstein geometry helps: the Wasserstein and KL retrieval maps differ only in their proximal Hessian -- dense and geometry-aware for $W^2$, diagonal and geometry-blind for KL -- and this difference damps the mass transport that query paraphrase induces. The theory yields a falsifiable prediction: the stability advantage is monotonically decreasing in step size $h$. We verify this empirically via free-energy descent, frequency-resolved perturbation response, the predicted $h$-dependence, and a certified-radius analysis. Four extensions are introduced: \textbf{\nmjko} (learned ground metric), \textbf{\bwjko} ($W^2$--KL interpolation), \textbf{\samjko} ($2\times$ speedup), and \textbf{\dualrank} (OT dual potentials as confidence signals). Across five BEIR benchmarks, \jko\ outperforms the cross-encoder on all five; the decisive advantage is robustness -- 22--38\% more stable under paraphrase, $2\times$ fewer leaked distractors.