Accurate prediction of unsteady separated flows is challenging because the aerodynamic loads depend on nonlinear separation and vortex-shedding dynamics. Although high-fidelity CFD resolves these mechanisms, its cost limits repeated use in design and control. Standard field-level surrogate training, however, does not distinguish the flow regions that contribute most strongly to the aerodynamic loads. We introduce VATO (Vortex-Force-Aware Transformer Operator), which couples the Vortex Force Map (VFM) method to a geometry-aware neural operator through two complementary mechanisms. VATO-S adds training-only supervision of the local VFM force-contribution field, with no increase in model size or inference cost. VATO-A uses VFM contribution and sensitivity fields to prioritise force-relevant source locations for residual cross attention. The methods are evaluated on unsteady CFD data for double-edged-plate aerofoils over 54 trajectories from nine geometries. Over lead times of 1-20~ms, VATO-S reduces velocity, pressure, and vorticity errors by 10.4\%, 1.0\%, and 15.6\%, respectively, while VATO-A achieves reductions of 15.8\%, 7.5\%, and 31.2\%. VATO-S gives the lowest VFM-derived drag error, whereas VATO-A gives the lowest pressure-derived lift and drag errors. Over lead times extending 50\% beyond the training range, VATO-A retains a 26.9\% reduction in vorticity error and larger improvements in all four force readouts, despite reduced gains in velocity and pressure. These results show that force-aware operator learning can improve both flow-field prediction and aerodynamic functional accuracy in unsteady separated flows.
Large non-uniform point sets make direct attention-based surrogate modeling costly for ship hydrodynamics. We introduce APPSolver, a point-wise flow-prediction framework built around Adaptive Patch Partitioning (APP), a deterministic quadtree representation for fixed two-dimensional horizontal slices extracted from ship CFD simulations. APP assigns finer patches near the hull and coarser patches farther away, downsamples patch contents, and recovers predictions to the full reference point set. Under a corrected protocol that constructs natural $(t,t+1)$ pairs before splitting, reuses training-set normalization statistics, and reports three model seeds, learned tokenizers are more accurate than APP-Transformer, and a persistence baseline has lower one-step MAE on all three ShipBench hulls. The supported benefit of APP is therefore computational rather than universal predictive superiority: on a representative DTC input, APP-Transformer requires 1.815 GFLOPs and 1.309 ms per model forward, while a matched ablation shows that adaptive partitioning reduces MAE by 16.4-24.9\% relative to a uniform partition augmented with learned slicing. Condition encoders provide setting-dependent gains in leave-one-hull-out evaluation, but the current absolute next-state objective does not establish accurate long-horizon dynamics. These results characterize APP as a compact spatial representation with an explicit accuracy--efficiency trade-off. Code is available at https://github.com/wenhuahuo/APPSolver .
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) embed governing partial differential equations directly into the training loss, offering a promising alternative to costly CFD solvers for unsteady flows. Yet the growing list of techniques proposed to improve PINN training is typically validated one at a time, leaving open whether these techniques actually compose. We study this question in depth on the DFG/Schafer-Turek unsteady cylinder wake benchmark. In isolation, nearly every technique performs no better than an untreated baseline. However, combining periodic (SIREN) activations with causal weighting unlocks a previously inaccessible regime, reconstructing velocity and pressure fields to within 4.1% average relative L2 error against an OpenFOAM reference solution. Adding further techniques instead causes catastrophic performance degradation, demonstrating that individually effective PINN interventions can interact nonlinearly and that more elaborate training recipes are not necessarily better.
Xin Zhang, Yipeng Huang, Shu Jiang +2physics.flu-dyn cs.AI
Aerodynamic simulation is a key component of engineering shape design, where core quantities such as the surface pressure coefficient strongly depend on flow dynamics near solid boundaries. Neural operators provide an efficient alternative to expensive Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solvers. However, conventional methods treat the boundary region isotropically, failing to account for the distinct physical behaviors along the boundaries. In reality, the aerodynamic process exhibits anisotropy: along the tangential direction, flow propagates along the wall; along the normal direction, physical quantities are constrained by the wall. To explicitly model the distinct physical behaviors, we propose GeoABC, a geometry-conditioned anisotropic boundary correction framework. GeoABC leverages the boundary geometries to introduce direction-aware boundary correction into the intermediate representations of neural operators, transforming boundary geometry from static input features into a structural prior that modulates physical prediction. On 2D airfoil and 3D car tasks, GeoABC consistently adapts to multiple neural operator backbones, reducing near-boundary relative $L_2$ error by $\sim$38\% on average, narrowing the structural near-wall gap shared by mainstream neural operators, and advancing neural operators toward high-fidelity aerodynamic simulation.
High-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is crucial to vehicle aerodynamic analysis, but its cost still constrains early-stage design exploration. Machine-learning-based surface-field prediction offers a faster alternative if the model can efficiently capture both global flow context and local geometric detail. This work proposes a machine-learning-based method, named the geometry-aware triplane field network (GTF-Net), for vehicle aerodynamic pressure and wall shear stress prediction. GTF-Net constructs triplane features directly from sampled surface points through a shared multilayer perceptron (MLP) and smooth bilinear rasterization. The planes are then processed by a dual-stream backbone that combines adaptive Fourier neural operator (AFNO) spectral mixing with convolutional neural network (CNN) refinement, so long-range aerodynamic coupling and local geometry-induced variations are modeled in the same representation. At query stage, sampled triplane features are combined with vehicle-aligned directional coordinates, normal-projection features, and a voxel-based curvature proxy. GTF-Net is compared with Transolver, geometry-informed neural operator (GINO), and TripNet, a triplane-based surrogate model. GTF-Net improves the relative L2 error from the strongest baseline value of 0.157 to 0.145 for pressure prediction and from 0.237 to 0.226 for wall shear stress prediction. Ablation results show that AFNO mixing, local CNN refinement, and query-side geometric encoding each contribute to accuracy, supporting the proposed mechanism of combining structured triplane representation with explicit aerodynamic geometry cues.
Zachary Cooper-Baldock, Paulo E. Santos, Russell S. A. Brinkworth +1cs.RO cs.LG
Autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) launch and recovery (LAR) into the hull of an advancing host platform requires traversal of a complex, three-dimensional propeller wake whose hydrodynamic structure cannot be characterised by a uniform current model. High-fidelity Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations resolve this structure with sufficient accuracy for path planning, but their computational cost renders them impractical for onboard use. We address this gap by integrating two conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) architectures -- a regularised PatchGAN and a 2D3DGAN with self-attention -- as drop-in replacements for RANS CFD data within a three-dimensional, energy-weighted A* path planning framework. Both generators are driven by a hierarchical pipeline that synthesises full $128^3$ voxel flow field volumes from scalar operating condition inputs alone, with end-to-end inference times of approximately 28-146 $μ$s, compared to hours for a single RANS computation. We benchmark all four environmental knowledge levels: uniform current, ground-truth CFD, PatchGAN, and 2D3DGAN~SA across 19,800 independently generated trajectories spanning 550 distinct flow conditions. Full CFD wake knowledge reduces energy expenditure by 5.7-12.5% and high-velocity wake-core encounters by up to 77.8% relative to uniform-current planning, with both benefits scaling with operating severity. The cGAN surrogates recover approximately 45-60% of the CFD energy benefit and high-velocity cell avoidance benefit while operating at inference speeds compatible with edge device use. These results provide the first systematic quantification of the downstream path planning value of cGAN-predicted hydrodynamic fields in a three-dimensional maritime robotics application.