BCPPO: Bachelier-Inspired Constrained Proximal Policy Optimization for Tail-Risk-Aware Safe Reinforcement Learning

Expected-cost constraints can still permit rare, high-cost events. Monte Carlo conditional value at risk (CVaR) gradients can be noisy at high confidence, whereas critics that model an outcome distribution add complexity. We propose BCPPO (Bachelier-Inspired Constrained Proximal Policy Optimization), a proximal policy optimization (PPO) method. Separately initialized cost-prediction networks (critics), trained with random sample masks, produce disagreement that marks predictions sensitive to which state-action regions occur in the training data and to critic training. A Bachelier formula for the expected amount above a reference level converts this disagreement into a smooth policy-update penalty. Gradients from this penalty do not alter the critics, so temporal-difference (TD) critic learning is unchanged. A saturation-aware controller adjusts the mean-cost penalty and stops accumulated error from growing while that penalty is clipped. Deployment retains only the policy network. The disagreement penalty is neither a tail-event probability nor a guaranteed error bound, and it provides no safety guarantee. Across 175 runs with shared tasks, costs, budgets, training steps, and evaluation seeds, no comparator attains both higher mean return and lower mean CVaR than BCPPO in any task. On Push1, BCPPO has no lower return and no higher CVaR than every comparator, with at least one strict gain. These results support a practical balance among reward, caution around cost predictions that vary across trained critics, and policy-only deployment.

Continuity-Free Near-Minimax Leading-Order Regret for CVaR-UCBVI

For finite-horizon tabular CVaR reinforcement learning, prior work proves a $\widetilde{O}(τ^{-1}\sqrt{SAK})$ leading regret bound for arbitrary normalized return laws and the sharper $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{SAK/τ})$ rate under a density lower bound. We show that the same Bernstein CVaR-UCBVI algorithm attains the sharper rate without continuity assumptions. The key is a selected-budget self-bound: the conditional variance of the episode shortfall is at most $τ$ plus the value-estimation width. Substitution into the original Bernstein decomposition yields, with high probability, $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{SAK/τ}+(SAHK^{1/4}+S^2AH)/τ)$ regret for arbitrary normalized return laws, including atomic, mixed, and continuous laws. The $τ^{-1/2}$ leading term matches the expected-regret minimax lower bound up to logarithmic factors. Thus Bernstein CVaR-UCBVI is minimax-optimal over the full return-law class in the leading-order regime; the lower-order terms retain their $τ^{-1}$ dependence.

Fine-Tuning Generative Models for Extreme Events via CVaR-Penalized Wasserstein Gradient Flows

We propose CVaR-penalized Generative Particle Algorithm (CVaR-GPA), a robust, tail-agnostic algorithm for fine-tuning generative models to learn heavy-tailed distributions and capture extreme events, requiring no prior knowledge or estimation of the target's tail characteristics. The method is the Wasserstein gradient flow of the Lipschitz-regularized Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence penalized by a Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) discrepancy term: the Lipschitz-regularized KL divergence enables robust learning under minimal assumptions on the target distribution, while the CVaR penalty restores the velocity that otherwise vanishes prematurely in the under-sampled tails. The penalized flow admits a bounded but non-Lipschitz velocity field. This departs from the Lipschitz transport maps of standard generators, which preserve the tail behavior of a light-tailed source, and enables transport toward heavier-tailed targets. To define this flow on empirical measures, we derive the first-variation subgradients of CVaR from its Rockafellar-Uryasev representation, valid precisely where the classical density-based formula fails. The particle algorithm CVaR-GPA fine-tunes the output samples of any pre-trained model, without access to its architecture, and runs on an adaptive time horizon set by a kinetic-energy stopping criterion rather than a preset depth. On synthetic isotropic and anisotropic Student-$t$ target distributions, Neal's funnel distribution, and the real-world high-dimensional Fama-French 25 portfolio dataset, CVaR-GPA dramatically improves global and tail accuracy on heavy-tailed targets over the pre-trained baseline.

Adaptive Finite-Budget Training for CVaR Risk-Aware Q-Learning

Risk-aware Q-learning (RaQL) provides a model-free, two-timescale estimator for dynamic risk objectives, but its finite-budget behavior remains fragile: fixed inner-loop hyperparameters can produce unstable value estimates, persistent Bellman residuals, and inefficient sample reuse. This paper proposes an adaptive training controller for Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) RaQL and evaluates it on a daily Bitcoin trading task. The controller preserves the original CVaR estimator and Bellman fixed point; instead, it redesigns the training procedure through six coordinated mechanisms: per-cell inner-step sizing, outer-rate-matched decay synchronization, a short early correction for the VaR-like inner variable, a coverage-first-then-greedy sample allocation rule, progressive suffix aggregation of mature inner estimates, and data-driven calibration of key scales from online-observable quantities. Across 20 random seeds and 856,000 inner-transition samples, the controller reduces the mean empirical CVaR Bellman residual by approximately 85% relative to the fixed-parameter baseline (MeanBEQ: 1.2202 to 0.1854; MeanBEV: 1.1624 to 0.0535) and maintains stability across CVaR levels, discount factors, and training budgets. On the chronological out-of-sample test set, the learned policy attains a Sharpe ratio of 0.9281 with a maximum drawdown of 6.46% after transaction costs. Although buy-and-hold yields a higher cumulative return (35.43% vs. 23.61%), the adaptive policy achieves far lower volatility (9.57% vs. 47.93%), drawdown, and CVaR loss. These results demonstrate that adaptive finite-budget training design, applied solely to the training procedure without altering the risk objective, can materially improve the reliability and risk-adjusted performance of risk-aware Q-learning in financial applications.

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Reliability Based Bi-Objective Portfolio Optimization

Portfolio optimization under uncertainty is inherently a multi-objective decision problem involving complex interactions among return, risk, market dynamics, and practical investment constraints. Existing reliability based portfolio optimization approaches primarily rely on static optimization frameworks and often fail to capture sequential decision making, tail risk, and market frictions such as transaction costs. To address these limitations, we propose a deep reinforcement learning framework for multi-objective reliability based portfolio optimization (MORP-DRL). The proposed framework jointly optimizes expected return and downside risk using three complementary risk measures: variance, Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), and Entropic Value-at-Risk (EVaR). To model uncertainty and heavy-tailed market behavior, asset returns are represented using GARCH(1,1), Extreme Value Theory, and a t-copula dependence structure, while realistic scenarios are generated through quasi-Monte Carlo simulation. A Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) based strategy is developed under practical constraints including transaction costs and portfolio bounds, and is benchmarked against NSGA-II. Experiments on ten global equity indices across pre-COVID, COVID, and post-COVID market regimes demonstrate that MORP-DRL achieves competitive risk-return performance, reduced downside risk during periods of market stress, and scalability to high-dimensional portfolio settings.