Humans are often considered to be the best listeners and seen as the upper-bound performance of automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems. We present a preliminary comparison of the performances of state-of-the-art ASR systems and Dutch native listeners on the recognition of "diverse" speech, specifically Dutch child and older adults' speech and Flemish. Google Telephony outperformed the other ASR systems. Importantly, the ASR systems showed similar performance to the listeners, and in specific cases even outperformed them. Slight performance differences between the listeners and ASR systems were found related to speaker's age and regional accents and utterance length. Future research should focus on making ASR systems more robust to acoustic variability related to aging and regional accents. A comparison of ASR recognition performances on the test stimuli and the full Jasmin-CGN test sets showed the influence of the specific test sets on the conclusions regarding benchmarking human and ASR performance.
\textbf{Background:} Dutch medical corpora are scarce, limiting NLP development. \\ \textbf{Methods:} We translated English datasets, identified medical text in generic corpora, and extracted open Dutch medical resources. \\ \textbf{Results:} The resulting corpus comprises $\pm$ 35 billion tokens across the medical domain in about 100 million documents, freely available on Hugging Face. \\ \textbf{Conclusion:} This work establishes the first large-scale Dutch medical language corpus for pre-training and downstream NLP tasks.