A Comparative Analysis of MLP and Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN) for Faster-than-Nyquist (FTN) Signaling Detection

Faster-than-Nyquist signaling improves spectral ef- ficiency by deliberately introducing inter-symbol interference. Classical sequence detectors such as BCJR can approach optimal performance, but their computational cost grows rapidly with channel memory. This paper investigates data-driven FTN BPSK detection under AWGN through a direct comparison between multilayer perceptrons and Kolmogorov Arnold Networks. A large-scale Monte Carlo dataset containing nearly four million labeled windows is generated for a time-packing factor of zero point eight and signal-to-noise ratio values from seven to ten decibels. The best MLP obtained from width sweeping uses hidden width thirty two, whereas the selected KAN uses hidden width four with spline grid size five. At ten decibels, the MLP produces a bit error rate of one point three times ten to the minus four, while the KAN reaches seven times ten to the minus six. This corresponds to an eighteen point six times lower bit error rate while using only one eighth of the MLP hidden width. The results show that KAN provides a more effective and more parameter-efficient neural decision model than the MLP baseline for FTN BPSK detection.

Kolmogorov Arnold networks (KAN) for aerodynamic prediction: a comparison with MLPs and GNNs

Kolmogorov Arnold networks (KAN) have recently been introduced as a (deep) neural network architecture whose trainable parameters adapt the activation functions, instead of the coefficients of the affine transformations at the core of traditional architectures such as deep multilayer perceptrons (MLPs). This architecture builds on the Kolmogorov-Arnold theorem, which endows it with universal approximation properties. While the advent of KANs has been received with excitement, there is a current debate about the possible KAN supremacy over deep multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) for classic fields such as symbolic regression, generic-purpose machine learning, natural language processing or computer vision. Here we assess the performance of KANs --and its nuanced comparison against MLPs and graph neural networks (GNNs)-- in the realm of fluid dynamics surrogate modelling. To that aim, we consider the task of predicting the surface pressure distribution over subsonic and transonic airfoils, a canonical task in aerodynamics. Our results show that KAN models show good performance in predicting the whole pressure coefficients and is able to interpolate across Mach numbers and angles of attack, however its performance is comparable --marginally inferior-- to a suitably trained MLP, where best performance is achieved by a GNN at the expense or requiring lengthier training. While the optimal KAN model have typically much lower complexity than MLP and GNN --hence resulting in faster training--, we find that KANs suffer from training instabilities, and their performance is highly dependent on a proper hyperparameter optimisation.