Discrete-Time MDP Modeling for Multi-Item Capacitated Lot Sizing with Stochastic Demand Timing

This paper studies a finite-horizon multi-item capacitated lot-sizing problem in which demand quantities are deterministic, while demand-arrival periods are stochastic. Each demand occurs once within a known time window and must be satisfied no later than its deadline. The proposed model makes production and allocation decisions at the demand level, allowing it to represent capacity competition, demand-specific backlog, and allocation-dependent inventory dynamics. The stochastic problem is formulated as a discrete-time Markov decision process (DTMDP), including the state space, feasible actions, transition kernel, and one-period cost function. To isolate the computational effect of stochastic timing, each stochastic instance is first compared with a deterministic counterpart in which each arrival distribution is replaced by its most likely arrival period. This comparison shows that stochastic timing substantially increases the number of states, the number of transitions, solution time, and memory pressure. A genetic algorithm (GA) is then proposed for the stochastic-timing problem. The GA searches over feasible state-feedback policies and evaluates each policy exactly under the DTMDP transition model. Computational experiments on 330 benchmark instances show that the GA remains close to the exact stochastic solution whenever the latter is available, with an average optimality gap of about $3.44\%$. On the difficult benchmark instances, comprising 90 test cases, the GA remains below the $5\%$ optimality-gap threshold and achieves an average optimization speedup of $6.89 \pm 1.41$ at the $95\%$ confidence level. For instances that cannot be solved exactly on the available hardware, an empirical Bellman-time regression is used to estimate the missing exact resolution time and extrapolate the expected GA speedup.

A Policy Decomposition Framework for Dynamic Order Fulfillment Operations

Modern supply chains span diverse operational environments, ranging from e-commerce distribution networks to customized production-to-order manufacturing lines. Across these settings, operational efficiency depends on coordinating two highly interdependent stages: order preparation and downstream delivery. Although these stages are traditionally managed in isolation, real-world fulfillment systems must satisfy stringent delivery expectations under dynamic stochastic order arrivals. To bridge this gap, we introduce the Dynamic Order Fulfillment Problem (DOFP), a new problem class unifying logistical challenges previously studied separately. We model DOFP as a Markov decision process whose state and decision spaces are partitioned into preparation and delivery sub-spaces, linked by synchronization constraints. While recent approaches attempt to optimize both fulfillment stages simultaneously over myopic rolling horizons, our framework isolates and optimizes the downstream delivery policy, treating preparation strictly as a state-level constraint filter. To solve this, we develop the Decomposition-Driven Framework with Value Function Approximation (DDF-VFA), which utilizes a novel policy-level decomposition. This design partitions the search into a delivery-stage master problem and a preparation-stage compatibility subproblem, iteratively refined via feedback loops. DDF-VFA executes this strategy by combining a large-neighborhood search over partial delivery decisions with a neural-network value function approximation for the cost-to-go. Numerical illustrations on two example variants using real-world datasets show that DDF-VFA consistently outperforms benchmarks that optimize the two stages independently or jointly without decomposition. Finally, the framework naturally scales to accommodate additional real-world complexities such as batched or multi-stage preparation.

Graphical conditional generative modeling for digital twin modeling

Digital twin modeling, including control and data assimilation under model uncertainty, often faces an open-ended fidelity problem: adding variables, data streams, and time scales can indefinitely increase model complexity, ultimately producing systems that are difficult to maintain, validate, interpret, and use for stress or safety testing. As an alternative, one can seek parsimonious stochastic surrogate models built only on the variables needed to describe the relevant quantities of interest. We introduce a framework for discovering such variables from observational data by identifying which candidate inputs influence the full conditional law of a target quantity, rather than only its conditional mean. This distinction is essential in stochastic, coarse-grained, or partially observed systems, where dependencies may appear through changes in variability, tail behavior, multimodality, or uncertainty rather than through deterministic functional relationships. The framework couples conditional generative modeling, which learns the conditional distribution of the target given candidate inputs, with Gaussian-process-based analysis of variance (through kernel mode decomposition), which enables iterative pruning of non-influential inputs and interpretable structure discovery. In control settings, the resulting surrogate can be interpreted as a learned Markov decision process: the method identifies not only a transition model, but also the state, action, and memory variables needed to make the learned dynamics effectively Markovian. Across examples involving stochastic dynamical systems, missing variables, PDE control, reinforcement learning, and economic data, the discovered structures yield interpretable stochastic surrogates whose downstream performance is comparable to models trained on the full variable set.

Bayesian learning for the stochastic shortest path problem

Sequential decision-making problems are often modelled as a Markov decision process (MDP). We focus on the stochastic shortest path (SSP) problem, which is an infinite-horizon undiscounted MDP with absorbing terminal states. We develop a Bayesian framework to learn the optimal decision strategy through interactions with the decision-making task. Specifically, we learn the optimal action-value function $Q^*$, but unlike many existing Bayesian approaches, we do not rely on unrealistic modelling assumptions and ad-hoc approximations. Our approach is to directly construct the posterior beliefs for $Q^*$ through Bellman's optimality equations. For deterministic rewards, we characterise the posterior as a distribution with a manifold density. To facilitate simpler inference, we relax the likelihood so that a Lebesgue density exists. The flip side is to create unidentifiability issues. Specifically, the relaxed posterior can have significant mass on improper decision rules, while the exact posterior will not. We also calculate the exact posterior probabilities for optimal action selections for the tabular parametrisation of $Q^*$, a Gaussian likelihood relaxation and a Gaussian prior, which is useful in benchmarking studies. Numerical studies on variants of the Deep Sea benchmark verify our findings. We demonstrate that our framework faithfully quantifies uncertainty and, compared to other temporal-difference-based Bayesian methodologies, is more data efficient. We conclude with recommendations for future work.

Enhanced Reinforcement Learning-based Process Synthesis via Quantum Computing

In this work, we present quantum reinforcement learning (RL) as a solution strategy for process synthesis problems. Building on our prior work, we develop a generalized framework that formally poses process synthesis as a Markov decision process and introduces quantum-enhanced RL algorithms to solve it with improved scalability. Earlier implementations of quantum-based RL for process synthesis were limited by qubit requirements, which scaled poorly with problem complexity. This work overcomes this challenge by introducing state encoding algorithms to decouple qubit requirements from problem size. A classical RL-based solution strategy is used as a baseline to benchmark the quantum algorithms under identical training conditions. All algorithms are evaluated across a flowsheet synthesis problem of increasing unit counts to analyze their performance and scalability. Results show that all approaches are capable of identifying the optimal flowsheet designs in small design spaces. For moderate-scale unit counts, quantum approaches demonstrate competitive performance on a per-episode basis and improved efficiency on a per-parameter basis versus the classical RL benchmark. This work provides a foundation for future quantum computing applications within process systems engineering, establishes a controlled benchmark for comparing classical and quantum algorithms, and shows that the proposed quantum variants remain competitive for the process synthesis problem examined in this work.