Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) embed governing partial differential equations directly into the training loss, offering a promising alternative to costly CFD solvers for unsteady flows. Yet the growing list of techniques proposed to improve PINN training is typically validated one at a time, leaving open whether these techniques actually compose. We study this question in depth on the DFG/Schafer-Turek unsteady cylinder wake benchmark. In isolation, nearly every technique performs no better than an untreated baseline. However, combining periodic (SIREN) activations with causal weighting unlocks a previously inaccessible regime, reconstructing velocity and pressure fields to within 4.1% average relative L2 error against an OpenFOAM reference solution. Adding further techniques instead causes catastrophic performance degradation, demonstrating that individually effective PINN interventions can interact nonlinearly and that more elaborate training recipes are not necessarily better.
Deep operator networks can become statistically unstable when partial differential equation inputs are observed at thousands of strongly correlated sensors but only a small number of operator samples is available. We introduce FAST-DeepONet, a branch representation combining a fixed spectral path with a regularized projection of the orthogonal residual, in which the directional penalty acts on the effective residual map after each of its rows is normalized. On Navier--Stokes flow a plain DeepONet degrades from $0.0394$ to $0.1556$ mean relative $L_2$ error as the branch grows from $129$ to $8193$ coordinates, while FAST-DeepONet stays near $0.04$, so the sensor grid can be refined without a statistical penalty. Across independent test sets for Navier--Stokes flow, Darcy flow, and signed terminal wavefield prediction it lowers mean relative $L_2$ error by $4.7\%$ to $37.0\%$ with three to seven times fewer trainable parameters. A spectral-only branch sharing the same basis separates the two paths: the fixed spectral path carries the improvement on Navier--Stokes and Darcy, while terminal wave prediction requires the residual path together with its directional penalty. FAST-DeepONet targets coordinate-query architectures and trains on solution values alone.
Khemraj Shukla, George Em Karniadakiscs.LG math-ph math.GN
Deep Operator Networks (DeepONets; arXiv:1910.03193) typically encode an input function through point values on a fixed discretization. Building on the Topological DeepONet framework of Ismailov (arXiv:2603.11972), we replace point samples by continuous linear functionals drawn from the continuous dual of a Hausdorff locally convex space $({V},\{p_α\}_{α\in A})$, whose topology is generated by a point-separating family of seminorms rather than a single norm, and develop fixed and adaptive functional measurement systems. Measurements are combined with the coefficient-space Two-Step procedure of Lee and Shin (arXiv:2309.01020), while a training-only decoder and regularization stabilize the adaptive coordinates. We derive a discrete error decomposition separating measurement, output-basis, and neural-approximation errors, together with a Barron-rate refinement. The framework is evaluated on the antiderivative operator, a non-normable locally convex input space, heterogeneous Darcy flow, a controlled operator, and fixed-time and time-evolving Navier-Stokes vorticity operators. In the heterogeneous Darcy problem, the functional models retain nearly resolution-independent errors of 5.5-5.6% on unseen grids, while in the controlled problem adaptive measurements reduce the mean error below 1.2%. For the fixed-time Navier-Stokes problem, the Adaptive Topological DeepONet is the most accurate DeepONet-based model, attaining a mean relative $L^2$ error of 1.685% +/- 0.017% using 128 functional coordinates. A comparably sized Fourier neural operator (FNO; arXiv:2010.08895) achieves the lower error 0.832% +/- 0.172%, but requires the full 64x64 input field, twice the training time, and 10.7x greater peak GPU memory. The formulation provides compact, interpretable, and discretization-portable coordinates in the continuous dual $V'$, including for non-normable input spaces.
Jonathan Gallagher, Roberto Guglielmics.LG eess.SY
We present a goal-agnostic control framework for partial differential equations (PDEs) built around an end-to-end joint-embedding predictive architecture (JEPA). A lightweight 2D vision-transformer (ViT) and action-conditioned latent dynamics are trained offline without a reward or downstream goal, before being frozen and reused by a model-predictive path integral (MPPI) controller. We minimize a control objective in the latent space, initially expressed via the $L^2$ distance and additionally illustrate the benefit of recasting the control objective in terms of an explicit physical observable when available. By instead minimizing the tracking error for a learned linear kinetic-energy (KE) probe on the frozen latent-state rollouts, we demonstrate the ability to reproduce the control of held-out trajectories with $R^2=0.989$, while requiring no change to the underlying world model. For a controlled 2D Navier--Stokes benchmark, using a KE-probe within MPPI planning improves the mean native reward from $-12.08\pm0.86$ for latent-$L^2$ tracking to $-10.90\pm0.91$ (95\% CI), all while lowering last-quarter velocity-field RMSE from $0.0765$ to $0.0692$. Across three intentionally withheld, dissimilar, aperiodic targets, KE planning lowers late field RMSE by $53\%$ relative to latent-$L^2$ planning ($0.0220$ versus $0.0469$), winning across 30 paired comparisons. The same frozen model also supports stabilization around a steady-state configuration via direct regulation of KE, achieving $2.7\%$ mean relative error. While the latent probe proves brittle to measurement noise and missing pixels, our findings support the claim that latent dynamics can remain flexible and goal-agnostic, particularly when calibrated observables (granted they guarantee unique continuation) are a suitable objective for state control.
C G Krishnanunni, Thomas Scott, Tan Bui-Thanhcs.LG math.NA math.OC
This work presents a novel approach for adapting neural network architecture along the depth based on a posteriori error estimation. By formulating neural network training as a continuous-time optimal control problem, we derive rigorous error estimates that quantify how approximation error distributes across network layers. This error decomposition enables a principled depth adaptation strategy: new layers are inserted at locations of maximum estimated error, allowing the network to efficiently capture complex, nonlinear variations in the underlying problem. Our framework introduces a novel network architecture that treats weights and biases as piecewise linear functions varying across layers, with the error estimator bounding the discrepancy between this discrete representation and the true continuous optimal control solution. The approach leverages dual weighted residual methodology from finite element analysis to derive computable upper bounds on the functional error. A key theoretical contribution is the derivation of explicit error bounds that decompose the total approximation error into interval-wise contributions, providing a rigorous basis for targeted architecture refinement. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on scientific datasets, including learning the observable-to-parameter map for the Navier-Stokes equation. Numerical results reveal that our approach consistently outperforms existing architecture adaptation methods in terms of generalization performance.
In this paper, we propose a perturbation-based conformal prediction framework for uncertainty quantification in operator learning, with a focus on the 2D Navier--Stokes equations. While neural operators provide fast surrogates for expensive PDE solvers, they do not by themselves provide calibrated uncertainty for spatiotemporal field predictions. Our approach wraps a trained Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) with split conformal prediction and constructs the local uncertainty scale by comparing the predictions of two operators trained on nearly identical datasets: one on the original labels and one on labels perturbed by small Gaussian noise. We consider this procedure in the data-scarce regime, where the total label budget is fixed and methods that require a separate uncertainty network must divide training data between multiple models. On the 2D Navier--Stokes benchmark, the perturbation-based method produces substantially narrower conformal bands than existing methods under matched total data budgets while maintaining the target simultaneous coverage. These results suggest that perturbation sensitivity is a practical and sample-efficient uncertainty proxy for conformalized neural operators.