SPEAR: Structure Property Explainability with Attention Regularization

Machine learning is increasingly used to learn structure property relationships from spectroscopic and diffraction data, yet its adoption in materials discovery is often limited by poor interpretability of model predictions. Although attention mechanisms are frequently treated as inherently explainable, unregularized attention can yield unstable, fragmented, or intensity driven attribution patterns that obscure the physical origin of these relationships. Here we introduce SPEAR (Structure Property Explainability with Attention Regularization), a framework that constrains attention distributions during training to improve their stability, selectivity, and physical interpretability. SPEAR augments attention based regression with a learnable temperature that controls attention concentration and a smoothness penalty that enforces coherence across neighboring spectral positions, treating attention as a learnable explanatory object rather than a post hoc visualization. Using synthetic spectral benchmarks with known generative structure, we show that attention regularization produces smooth, contiguous attribution profiles aligned with causal features while preserving predictive accuracy. Applied to experimental X ray diffraction data from a combinatorial rare earth zirconate thin film library, the regularized model selectively emphasizes physically relevant diffraction features and decouples feature importance from raw peak intensity. The reflection it identified prompted a reassessment of our earlier structural analysis, revealing a correlation between the 220 peak position, the tetragonal distortion that accommodates cation size disorder, and the local thermal conductivity. Attention regularization therefore provides a principled training constraint for explainable structure property regression, yielding mechanistically meaningful explanations without sacrificing predictive performance.

XRDiff: Crystal Structure Prediction from Powder X-Ray Diffraction Data Using Diffusion Models

Determining the crystal structure of a material from its powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern is a central challenge in materials science. PXRD is an accessible and widely used characterization technique, yet recovering the atomic structure from diffraction data requires solving an underdetermined inverse problem due to the loss of phase information. Generative modeling can provide a prior over atomic structure and learn the mapping from PXRD patterns to crystal structures via simulated structure-spectrum pairs. We present XRDiff, a diffusion model that recovers crystal structures from PXRD given either the stoichiometry or, in a more challenging setting, the elemental constituents and total number of atoms in the unit cell. We evaluate on datasets where each stoichiometry has multiple polymorphs and all polymorphs of a given composition are held out together, ensuring that high performance reflects genuine use of the diffraction signal. XRDiff achieves strong structure recovery rates on simulated benchmarks, indicating that the model learns a spectrum-to-structure mapping precise enough to differentiate between polymorphs. To address generalization to experimental data, we compare a full-spectrum encoding against an encoding based on peak descriptors. The peak-based encoding generalizes substantially better, outperforming even a model trained on full spectra with augmentations fitted to the experimental noise distribution. These results demonstrate that representations robust to the noise and artifacts present in real-world PXRD offer a practical and scalable path toward closing the simulation-to-experiment gap, enabling zero-shot crystal structure solution from experimental PXRD with full or partial chemical composition input.

Fantastic Scientific Agents and How to Build Them: AgentBuild for Rietveld Refinement

As scientific workflows shift from deterministic executables to LLM-based agents, the development practices on offer, such as fine-tuning, reinforcement learning, and prompt-and-go, bury the scientist's judgment. We propose treating agent construction as a workflow stage and introduce AgentBuild, which builds a scientific agent from a contract the scientist authors. The contract is a version-controlled rubric, a difficulty-graded curriculum, and a curated external knowledge base. A rubric-driven judge gates a meta-optimizer coding agent that edits the agent within a declared boundary, so the build compiles the agent, not the scientist's judgment. We instantiate this for Rietveld refinement of X-ray diffraction data through GSAS-II behind MCP and A2A, where a blank-harness construction run progresses through a lithium lanthanum zirconium oxide (LLZO) signal-to-noise ladder, reaches the 4 hour scan as a frontier case, and exposes the workflow-scope limits that remain. The same rubric that rewards credible fits also scores trajectory scope, making the frontier a contract failure rather than a pattern-fitting failure. As base models evolve, re-running AgentBuild is a re-tune, not a rebuild, and the scientist's authored contract remains the durable asset.