SCOUT: Semantic scene COverage via Uncertainty-guided Traversal

Robots that operate over extended periods should not merely visit space; they should progressively understand it. Yet most 3D scene graph pipelines treat perception as a post-processing stage over a fixed dataset, decoupling scene representation from the decisions that determine what is observed in the first place. We present SCOUT, an online semantic exploration framework that closes this loop by coupling active traversal with probabilistic scene graph construction. Given a prior 2D occupancy map and posed RGB-D observations, SCOUT incrementally builds an uncertainty-aware 3D scene graph whose nodes maintain fused geometry and posterior beliefs over open-vocabulary object labels, while edges encode structural relations such as on, inside, belong, and next to. These beliefs are fed back to an uncertainty-guided traversal planner, which selects viewpoints by balancing expected semantic certainty gain, geometric coverage gain, and travel cost. In this way, the robot revisits ambiguous objects when additional evidence matters and expands into unseen free space when the scene remains incomplete. The resulting system treats semantic scene completeness as an operational objective rather than a passive by-product of semantic mapping, moving toward autonomous agents that can patrol, update, and reason about evolving indoor environments with minimal human intervention.

Human Adults and LLMs as Scientists: Who Benefits from Active Exploration?

A long-standing finding in the causal learning literature is that adults struggle to identify conjunctive causal rules, where an effect requires the simultaneous presence of multiple causes, while performing better in disjunctive settings. However, most demonstrations of this ``conjunctive handicap'' rely on passive observation paradigms with limited evidence, where learners have no control over evidence generation. This paper asks whether this bias persists when adults are granted agency through active exploration. Using a modified ``blicket detector'' task, adult participants freely intervened to identify causal objects under conjunctive or disjunctive rule structures. We show that active exploration substantially improves adults' conjunctive causal reasoning, although conjunctive rules still require more tests to infer than disjunctive rules. We further compare human performance to a range of large language models in the same setting. While some state-of-the-art models approach human-level performance on hypothesis inference accuracy, they often exhibit less efficient exploration strategies and similar conjunctive-disjunctive performance gaps.