Quantization-Triggered Backdoors in Language Models: Cross-Quantizer Transferability and the Validation--Deployment Gap

Post-training quantization is often treated as a semantically neutral optimization for edge deployment of Large Language Models. When a full-precision source checkpoint is evaluated and quantization is applied downstream without equivalent re-evaluation, this workflow creates a structural validation--deployment gap: because quantization is a many-to-one mapping over parameter space, source-precision certification does not guarantee behavioral equivalence in the deployed configuration. We formalize this gap through Quantization Behavioral Equivalence Classes (QBECs) and prove that QBEC membership does not imply behavioral equivalence, providing a theoretical basis for quantization-triggered backdoor attacks. Building on a three-stage adversarial fine-tuning framework, we embed latent malicious payloads into models that satisfy the source-precision checks used in our evaluation, yet activate targeted adversarial behavior upon INT8 or 4-bit compression. We evaluate this threat in two operationally motivated scenarios, tactical machine translation and political content analysis, extending prior work from decoder-only causal LMs to multilingual encoder-decoder sequence-to-sequence models. Results show that backdoored translation models move from zero measured friend--foe corruption at repaired FP16 to up to 85.02% inversion after quantization, and that a paired stance classifier measures an ideological shift of up to $Δ\mathrm{Bias}=0.33$ upon compression. A cross-quantizer transferability analysis further shows that attack persistence varies across quantization schemes and model architectures, rather than being determined by nominal bit-width alone. These findings demonstrate that source-precision auditing alone does not rule out quantization-triggered behavior and that the final deployed configuration must be included in behavioral certification for trustworthy edge AI.

Not All Tokens Are Equal: Region-Aware Consistency Repair of Backdoors in MLLMs

MLLMs are increasingly deployed in user-facing applications, yet they inherit backdoor risks from the pipelines used to construct them: triggers may reside in images, texts, or both. Existing model-level backdoor removal methods, largely designed for conventional classifiers, show limited effectiveness on MLLMs, while MLLM-specific defenses mainly operate at inference time, filtering suspicious inputs without removing the backdoor embedded in the model. To address this gap and eliminate latent backdoors from MLLMs at their source, we present RACER, a model-level repair framework motivated by a key observation: backdoors induce abnormal layer-to-layer evolution in internal representations, which we term the layer-wise inconsistency anomaly. Importantly, this anomaly is modality-dependent, concentrating primarily in the token region encoding the trigger features that the backdoor model actually relies on. RACER therefore decomposes the fused representation into visual and textual token regions, normalizes their layer-wise inconsistency separately, and recomposes them using modality-aware weights over a deep-layer window, yielding a region-aware inconsistency objective that better captures localized backdoor-induced anomalies. Through a min-max optimization, this objective drives worst-case perturbation synthesis and adversarial fine-tuning against the resulting perturbation to repair the model, suppressing the deep representational directional shifts on which backdoor behaviors rely. RACER requires only 100 clean samples and no knowledge of the trigger, attack objective, or even whether the input model contains a backdoor. Evaluations on three open-source MLLMs across 36 backdoor settings spanning image, text, and multimodal triggers show that RACER reduces the average ASR to 1.1%, reaching 0% in 32 settings, while preserving clean-task utility on both backdoor and clean models.

Unifying Adversarially Robust Model Experts in Vision-Language Models

Vision-language models (VLMs), such as CLIP, are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, posing a serious problem for real-life applications and deployment. Adversarial fine-tuning emerges as a prominent defense method; however, different fine-tuning strategies often produce specialized models with distinct robustness characteristics. Each fine-tuned model in turn thrives in some evaluation settings but falters on others, limiting their defensive capabilities. We refer to these specialized fine-tuned models as robust model experts and propose a collaborative adversarial fine-tuning framework: CARE - Collaborative Adversarial Robustness fine-tuning using Embedding alignment. CARE maintains multiple experts during training, enables knowledge exchange through embedding-space harmonization, and consolidates the learned knowledge into a single unified robust model. Experts benefit from one another while preserving their individual specializations, enabling the final model to inherit complementary robustness properties. In this paper, we demonstrate CARE on two different adversarial fine-tuning strategies with complementary robustness behaviors. Extensive experiments on classic image classification and downstream vision-language tasks display the effectiveness of our approach, with CARE being able to outperform individually learned model experts. The results suggest that collaborative learning across model experts is a promising direction for improving adversarial robustness.

Single-Cell Cross-Modal Transfer by Adversarial Fine-Tuning of Foundation Models

Spatial transcriptomics (ST) is a powerful tool for exploring biological properties dependent on structure, proximity, and interaction in tissue. The methods underpinning ST are developing rapidly but are limited in their ability to profile many thousands of genes at a subcellular scale. Although dissociated from tissue, it is known that the whole-transcriptome readouts of cells in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) retain information about their former in situ neighbourhoods, motivating computational methods to recover it. While paired ST and scRNA-seq datasets are scarce, each modality in its own right is abundantly available. We therefore propose to perform cross-modal translation between unpaired ST and scRNA-seq data. In this work we show that a single-cell foundation model can perform this translation via adversarial fine-tuning. We demonstrate that our method performs favourably against methods built for multi-omics translation.