Augmenting Text to Increase Translation Difficulty

As state-of-the-art machine translation models saturate standard benchmarks, the field needs more challenging evaluations to distinguish between models of varying quality. We propose augmenting existing benchmarks to increase translation difficulty by combining adversarial optimization with a differentiable translation difficulty estimator. Our Adversarial Translation Optimization (ATO) uses gradients from a combined difficulty and fluency objective to iteratively replace tokens. Because each step branches over candidate substitutions at every position, optimization becomes a tree search problem, which we address with Beam Search. ATO offers a gradient-based alternative to LLM-based dataset creation without LLM prompting, expensive human curation, or task-specific model training. Our ATO-modified benchmark lowers average translation quality (xCOMET) from 0.93 to 0.82, compared to 0.88 for paraphrasing and 0.86 for a zero-shot baseline. Human evaluation shows the modified texts are somewhat less natural than the baselines but remain reasonably grammatical and plausible while being substantially harder to translate. We release two datasets of 350 English texts each, generated by our methods, as well as the code.

Bypassing Krum: Selection-Aware Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning

Robust aggregation methods are widely used in federated learning to mitigate the impact of adversarial client behavior. Distance-based aggregation rules, such as Krum and Multi-Krum, select updates that are closest to the majority under the assumption that benign updates form a compact cluster. However, these methods rely on geometric properties that can be exploited by adaptive adversaries. We introduce the Krum-Proxy attack, a selection-aware backdoor injection strategy that consistently bypasses Byzantine-robust aggregation. Rather than relying on naive scaling or constraining, our method actively optimizes malicious updates to infiltrate the dense core of the benign distribution. The proposed method constructs adversarial updates that are not only similar to benign updates but are also optimized to lie in regions of the update space that are favored during aggregation. This is achieved through a two-stage optimization procedure that separates task-specific attack objectives from geometry-aware refinement, using a nearest-neighbor proxy, stochastic reference modeling, and anchor-guided alignment. To maintain stealth, we introduce a projection mechanism that constrains adversarial updates within realistic norm and variance bounds. Experiments on standard federated learning benchmarks show that Krum-Proxy achieves higher attack success while preserving clean accuracy, highlighting the vulnerability of distance-based aggregation to selection-aware adversaries.

Addressing Over-Refusal in LLMs with Competing Rewards

Safety training on language models often induces over-refusal: improved safety on harmful prompts at the cost of increased refusal on harmless ones. Though this trade-off can be mitigated by training models with reinforcement learning (RL) to reason before answering, it does not remove the underlying problem that reasoning can often be a "rubber stamp" for a predetermined response. In this paper, we address the safety-refusal trade-off by rethinking how models are trained to reason about safety. Our key insight is that unsafe reasoning can itself serve as a useful exploratory signal. Rather than preemptively blocking harmful thoughts, we encourage the model to sufficiently explore unsafe reasoning but produce a safe response. The harmful exploration improves the model's ability to distinguish harmful from harmless prompts by resolving ambiguity, allowing it to remain safe while complying only when appropriate. We cast this as an adversarial optimization problem in which a reasoning player explores strategies for producing an unsafe response and an answer player ensures that the final output is safe. We train a single model with dense rewards to play both roles within one chain-of-thought, across different segments. To achieve this, we find that process rewards are crucial for stable optimization of competing objectives. Our resulting model SEAR deliberately engages in harmful reasoning as exploration while reliably flipping back to a safe answer. We demonstrate that this behavior helps mitigate over-refusal and defend against attacks that directly manipulate the reasoning to be harmful.

Adversarial Update-Based Federated Unlearning for Poisoned Model Recovery

Federated learning (FL) is vulnerable to poisoning attacks, where malicious clients upload manipulated updates to degrade the performance of the global model. Although detection methods can identify and remove malicious clients, the model remains affected. Retraining from scratch is effective but costly, and existing unlearning methods remain unsatisfactory in both effectiveness and efficiency. We propose Federated Adversarial Unlearning (FAUN), a lightweight framework that retains only a short window of malicious clients' updates and employs adversarial optimization on a proxy dataset to derive updates that eliminate malicious directions. Applying these updates for a few unlearning rounds, followed by benign fine-tuning, enables fast removal of malicious effects and stable recovery. Experiments on three canonical datasets show that FAUN achieves recovery comparable to retraining while requiring far fewer rounds and reduces attack success rates to near zero, confirming FAUN successfully eliminates the contributions of unlearned clients.