3D Weighted Geometric Graph Neural Networks for Sheep Facial Pain Assessment

Deep learning systems perform mainly within the 2D for a single image domain and take the face as a single-dimension representation, losing sight of the 3D anatomy of sheep and cross-landmark spatial relationships that are intrinsic to the clinically proven Sheep Pain Facial Expression Scale (SPFES). This paper presents the \textbf{3D Sheep Pain Facial Expression System (3D-SPFES)}, a novel, monocular depth-aware geometric graph neural network system that integrates each SPFES facial landmark, such as the ears, eyes, and nose, into 3D Euclidean space estimated from a single RGB camera by using VideoDepthAnything, thus preventing the need for specialized depth hardware. Each landmark node includes a feature vector containing its 3D spatial coordinates, estimated surface normal, and facial attribute class embedding. Edges linked to nodes are assigned weights based on an aggregate metric that combines both Euclidean distance and surface co-planarity in a 3D space. A Weighted Geometric Graph Neural Network (WG-GNN) studies this graph using $\mathcal{K} = 3$ geometry-aware message-passing layers enhanced by a scaled dot-product attention method that selectively enhances anatomically relevant inter-landmark messages. The resultant node embeddings are combined into $\mathcal{O} = 3$ pain-level clusters and integrated into a Normalized Pain Score (NPS) within the range of $[0, 100%]$ a confidence-weighted, SPFES-derived scoring method.

Your AI Travel Agent Would Book You a Bullfight: An Agentic Benchmark for Implicit Animal Welfare in Frontier AI Models

AI agents are moving from advisors to actors, booking travel, planning menus, and running procurement on behalf of users. Existing benchmarks for AI and animal welfare evaluate model text responses to question-answer prompts, leaving open whether the welfare reasoning surfaced in those responses transfers to agentic deployment where the model must take actions with tools. We introduce TAC (Travel Agent Compassion), the first agentic benchmark measuring whether AI agents avoid options involving animal exploitation when acting on behalf of users. TAC presents an AI agent with twelve hand-authored travel booking scenarios across six categories of animal exploitation, augmented to forty-eight samples to control for price, rating, and position confounds. We evaluate seven frontier models from four labs. Every model scores below the chance level of sixty-four percent, with the best performer (Claude Opus 4.7) at fifty-three percent. A single welfare-aware sentence in the system prompt yields gains of forty-seven to sixty-three percentage points in Claude and GPT-5.5, twenty-six points in GPT-5.2, and under twelve points in DeepSeek and Gemini. An auxiliary Inspect Scout audit of 288 base-condition transcripts from the top two performers, using Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite as judge, flags zero transcripts for evaluation awareness, suggesting the below-chance rates do not stem from the models recognising the evaluation. We discuss implications for category-level variation across cultural domains, the limits of text-response welfare benchmarks, and the EU General-Purpose AI Code of Practice systemic risk framework.